Author:
Hofstra Bas,Kulkarni Vivek V.,Munoz-Najar Galvez Sebastian,He Bryan,Jurafsky Dan,McFarland Daniel A.
Abstract
Prior work finds a diversity paradox: Diversity breeds innovation, yet underrepresented groups that diversify organizations have less successful careers within them. Does the diversity paradox hold for scientists as well? We study this by utilizing a near-complete population of ∼1.2 million US doctoral recipients from 1977 to 2015 and following their careers into publishing and faculty positions. We use text analysis and machine learning to answer a series of questions: How do we detect scientific innovations? Are underrepresented groups more likely to generate scientific innovations? And are the innovations of underrepresented groups adopted and rewarded? Our analyses show that underrepresented groups produce higher rates of scientific novelty. However, their novel contributions are devalued and discounted: For example, novel contributions by gender and racial minorities are taken up by other scholars at lower rates than novel contributions by gender and racial majorities, and equally impactful contributions of gender and racial minorities are less likely to result in successful scientific careers than for majority groups. These results suggest there may be unwarranted reproduction of stratification in academic careers that discounts diversity’s role in innovation and partly explains the underrepresentation of some groups in academia.
Publisher
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Reference46 articles.
1. R. K. Merton , The Sociology of Science (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, 1973).
2. The Strength of Weak Ties
3. Structural Holes and Good Ideas
4. Opinion: Gender diversity leads to better science
5. S. E. Page , The Diversity Bonus: How Great Teams Payoff in the Knowledge Economy (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 2009).
Cited by
483 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献