Bibliometría y Cienciometría, conocimiento y práctica indispensables para los estudiantes de ciencias médicas

Author:

Herrera Horta Guillermo AlejandroORCID,Gutiérrez García ZurelysORCID

Abstract

During the last century there has been a spectacular increase in scientific production at international and national level, as well as its compilation in automated bibliographic databases, whose results have great influence on the economic and social development of countries, which demands the quantification and evaluation of scientific and technological activity, its results and yields. Bibliometrics and scientometrics are increasingly positioned as essential disciplines to measure the results of science, and despite this, not all members of the student scientific community recognize them as necessary in the information and communications era, as a way to improve and bring to higher levels the excellence in the student research process and its impact on scientific publications. Bibliometrics studies the quantitative aspects of the production, dissemination and use of recorded information, to which end it develops mathematical models and measurements that, in turn, serve to make forecasts and decisions about these processes. For its part, scientometrics studies the quantitative aspects of science as a discipline or economic activity, is part of the sociology of science, and finds application in the establishment of scientific policies, where it includes, among others, those of publication.

Publisher

Salud, Ciencia y Tecnologia

Reference4 articles.

1. Vargas, V. SPOC de Vigilancia tecnológica, cienciometría y bibliometría dirigido al personal bibliotecario miembro de UNIRED. 2023. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12749/19070

2. Aranibar Ramos ER. Cienciometría: actividad científica de las universidades públicas del sur del Perú en Scopus. Revista Conrado. 2023;19(91):95-08.

3. Castillo JIR. Identifying promising research areas in health using bibliometric analysis. Data and Metadata 2022;1:10–10. https://doi.org/10.56294/dm202210.

4. Ledesma F, González BEM. Bibliometric indicators and decision making. Data and Metadata 2022;1:9–9. https://doi.org/10.56294/dm20229.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3