Abstract
Introduction: Cleft lip and palate is the most prevalent craniofacial congenital defect worldwide. It consists of a labial or palatal cleft, even a combination of both. It is currently known that cleft lip and palate have multifactorial causes, which include both genetic and environmental factors, which influence the first trimester of pregnancy. Objective: To describe environmental factors in patients with cleft lip and palate treated at the William Soler Pediatric Hospital, in the period between 2021 and 2022. Methodological design: Descriptive, cross-sectional and retrospective study in patients with a diagnosis of cleft lip and palate. The sample was characterized taking into account sex, type of fissure, maternal toxic habits, exposure to radiation, mechanical injuries and environmental toxins, drug consumption, as well as acute and chronic maternal diseases. Data collected during interrogation and physical examination were used. Results: isolated palatal clefts represented 50,5 %. 13,7 % of mothers smoked during the first trimester of pregnancy, while 10,5 % consumed alcohol. High blood pressure (25 %) was the most common maternal chronic disease while 41 % were diagnosed with vaginal moniliasis. Conclusions: Isolated cleft palate and considerable tobacco and alcohol consumption among pregnant women predominated. Among the chronic diseases, there was a predominance of high blood pressure, the most frequent infectious diseases were vaginal moniliasis and urinary tract infections, and there was a high frequency of the consumption of clotrimazole and oral contraceptives
Publisher
Salud, Ciencia y Tecnologia
Reference34 articles.
1. Shaw DW. Global strategies to reduce the health care burden of craniofacial anomalies: report of WHO meetings on international collaborative research on craniofacial anomalies. Cleft Palate Craniofac J [Internet]. 2004 [citado el 10 de diciembre de 2022]; 41(3):238–43. Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1597/03-214.1
2. Leiva N, Stange C, Ayala F, Fuentes V. Clasificación anatómica: una propuesta para categorizar las fisuras labiopalatinas. Odontol Sanmarquina [Internet]. 12 de septiembre de 2019 [citado 13 de enero de 2024]; 22(3):245-9. Disponible en: https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/odont/article/view/16717
3. Martí Cabrera E, Redondo Sedano J, Mathabathe L, Gómez Sánchez A, Delgado Muñoz MD. Fisuras orofaciales: Fisura labial y/o palatina. FMC - Form Médica Contin Aten Primaria [Internet]. 2021 [citado el 13 de enero de 2024]; 28(10):567–72. Disponible en: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/356743803_Fisuras_orofaciales_Fisura_labial_yo_palatina/citation/download. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fmc.2020.12.003
4. Borrero Zamudio DC, Gutiérrez Ricaurte SP, Izaguirre Downing DM, Otero Mendoza LM. Caracterización fenotípica de la morfología facial en un grupo de población africana con fisura labio-palatina no sindrómica. Univ Odontol [Internet]. 2010 [citado el 13 de enero de 2024];29(62):11–8. Disponible en: https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=231216375002
5. Pérez-González A, Lavielle-Sotomayor P, Clark P, Tusie-Luna MT, Palafox D. Factores de riesgo en pacientes con fisura de labio y paladar en México. Estudio en 209 pacientes. Cir. plást. iberolatinoam. [Internet]. 2021 Dic [citado 2024 Ene 13] ; 47( 4 ): 389-394. Disponible en: http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0376-78922021000400389&lng=es. Epub 28-Mar-2022. https://dx.doi.org/10.4321/s0376-78922021000400009.