Abstract
AbstractPublic participation in international environmental decision-making can seek to fulfil different goals. This article explains how these goals can affect the design and appraisal of participatory processes and highlights the under-recognised value of law in determining the objectives of public participation in international environmental forums. A doctrinal analysis finds that substantive goals are most prominent in current international environmental law, but that a normative rationale for public participation could be gaining more formal endorsement through the growing legal recognition of linkages between procedural human rights and environmental protection.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Law,Political Science and International Relations
Reference30 articles.
1. The “Participatory Revolution” in International Environmental Law;Raustiala;HarvEnvtlLRev,1997
2. A European Commitment to Environmental Citizenship: Article 3.7 of the Aarhus Convention and Public Participation in International Forums;Dannenmaier;YIntlEnvL,2008
3. Climate Change-related Aarhus Conflicts: How Successful are Procedural Rights in EU Climate Law?
4. Analysis, participation and power: justification and closure in participatory multi-criteria analysis
5. Inclusive Risk Governance: Concepts and Application to Environmental Policy Making;Renn;EPG,2009
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献