Author:
Thomsen Cynthia J.,Borgida Eugene
Abstract
AbstractKoehler's summary and critique of research on the base rate fallacy is cogent and persuasive. However, he may have overstated the case, and his suggestions for future research may be too restrictive. We agree that methodological approaches to this topic should be broadened, but we argue that experimental laboratory research and the Bayesian normative standard are useful and should not be abandoned.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Behavioral Neuroscience,Physiology,Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
Reference315 articles.
1. The cognitive unconscious: An evolutionary perspective
2. Trial by Mathematics: Precision and Ritual in the Legal Process
3. Categorization by a connectionist network;Shanks;Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition,1991
4. Saks S. L. & Fishback C. L. (1994) Sensitivity in a Bayesian judgment task: Can the inputs support the process? Unpublished manuscript, University of South Florida. [aJJK]
5. “Debate” (1991) Debate on statistics and evidentiary theory. Tulane Law Review 65 & 66. [aJJK]
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献