Law, Legal Socializations, and Epistemic Injustice
-
Published:2022-06-06
Issue:3
Volume:47
Page:1026-1046
-
ISSN:0897-6546
-
Container-title:Law & Social Inquiry
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Law Soc. Inq.
Author:
Ballakrishnen Swethaa S.,Lawsky Sarah B.
Abstract
This review essay looks at the relationship between Deborah Tuerkheimer’s Credible (2021) and Meera Deo’s Unequal Profession (2019) in order to make a substantive point about inequality in legal institutions and the methods that are employed in dissecting them. At first glance, the connections between these projects might not seem apparent, although each deals with the inequalities in which its actors in focus are embedded. But both projects go deeper by unveiling institutional inequities that are often in plain sight when we investigate the background frameworks implicated in their production, and they reveal the problematic relationship between everyday discrimination and the systemic biases that justify them. Finally, reading these books together allows us to make an intervention about the methods and credibility of narratives within socio-legal scholarship more generally. In theorizing about legitimacy, we ask how the way in which we are told to look at structures of normativity changes the kinds of inequities we are able to see.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Law,General Social Sciences
Reference36 articles.
1. Incredible Women: Sexual Violence and the Credibility Discount;Tuerkheimer;University of Pennsylvania Law Review,2017
2. Just One of the Guys?
3. Epistemic Injustice
4. Ballakrishnen, Swethaa S. . Forthcoming. “Vulnerability Politics and Its (Out) of Place in the Academy.” In Out of Place: Power, Person, and Differences in Socio-legal Research, edited by Chua, Lynette and Massoud, Mark Fathi .
5. Two Kinds of Unknowing
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献