Abstract
Abstract
Objective:
This study evaluated the independent and combined environmental impacts of the consumption of beef and ultra-processed foods in Brazil.
Design:
Cross-sectional study.
Setting:
Brazil.
Participants:
We used food purchases data from a national household budget survey conducted between July 2017 and July 2018, representing all Brazilian households. Food purchases were converted into energy, carbon footprints and water footprints. Multiple linear regression models were used to assess the association between quintiles of beef and ultra-processed foods in total energy purchases and the environmental footprints, controlling for sociodemographic variables.
Results:
Both beef and ultra-processed foods had a significant linear association with carbon and water footprints (P < 0·01) in crude and adjusted models. In the crude upper quintile of beef purchases, carbon and water footprints were 47·7 % and 30·8 % higher, respectively, compared to the lower quintile. The upper quintile of ultra-processed food purchases showed carbon and water footprints 14·4 % and 22·8 % higher, respectively, than the lower quintile. The greatest reduction in environmental footprints would occur when both beef and ultra-processed food purchases are decreased, resulting in a 21·1 % reduction in carbon footprint and a 20·0 % reduction in water footprint.
Conclusions:
Although the environmental footprints associated with beef consumption are higher, dietary patterns with lower consumption of beef and ultra-processed foods combined showed the greatest reduction in carbon and water footprints in Brazil. The high consumption of beef and ultra-processed foods is harmful to human health, as well as to the environment; thus, their reduction is beneficial to both.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Nutrition and Dietetics,Medicine (miscellaneous)
Reference52 articles.
1. Carbon footprint of away-from-home food consumption in Brazilian diet;Bezerra;Int J Environ Res Public Health,2022
2. Health effects of dietary risks in 195 countries, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study;Afshin;Lancet,2017
3. Consumption of ultra-processed foods and health status: a systematic review and meta-analysis;Pagliai;Br J Nutr,2021
4. Association between total, processed, red and white meat consumption and all-cause, CVD and IHD mortality: a meta-analysis of cohort studies;Abete;Br J Nutr.,2014
5. The global syndemic of obesity, undernutrition, and climate change: the lancet commission report;Swinburn;Lancet,2019