Author:
Räsänen Pirjo,Roine Eija,Sintonen Harri,Semberg-Konttinen Virpi,Ryynänen Olli-Pekka,Roine Risto
Abstract
Objectives: The objectives of this study were to identify, in a systematic literature review, published studies having used quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) based on actual measurements of patients' health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and to determine which HRQoL instruments have been used to calculate QALYs. Furthermore, the aims were to characterize studies with regard to medical specialty, intervention studied, results obtained, quality, country of origin, QALY gain observed, and interpretation of results regarding cost-effectiveness.Methods: Systematic searches of the literature were made using the MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, SCI, and Cochrane Library electronic databases. Initial screening of identified articles was based on abstracts read independently by two of the authors; full-text articles were again evaluated by two authors, who made the final decision on which articles should be included.Results: The search identified 3,882 articles; 624 were obtained for closer review. Of the reviewed full-text articles, seventy reported QALYs based on actual before–after measurements using a valid HRQoL instrument. The most frequently used instrument was EuroQol HRQoL instrument (EQ-5D, 47.5 percent). Other instruments used were Health Utilities Index (HUI, 8.8 percent), the Rosser–Kind Index (6.3 percent), Quality of Well-Being (QWB, 6.3 percent), Short Form-6D (SF-6D, 5.0 percent), and 15D (2.5 percent). The rest (23.8 percent) used a direct valuation method: Time Trade-Off (10.0 percent), Standard Gamble (5.0 percent), visual analogue scale (5.0 percent), or rating scale (3.8 percent). The most frequently studied medical specialties were orthopedics (15.5 percent), pulmonary diseases (12.7 percent), and cardiology (9.9 percent). Ninety percent of the studies came from four countries: United Kingdom, United States, Canada, the Netherlands. Approximately half of the papers were methodologically high quality randomized trials. Forty-nine percent of the studied interventions were viewed by the authors of the original studies as being cost-effective; only 13 percent of interventions were deemed not to be cost-effective.Conclusions: Although QALYs gained are considered an important measure of effectiveness of health care, the number of studies in which QALYs are based on actual measurements of patients' HRQoL is still fairly limited.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Reference17 articles.
1. Hailey D , Ohinmaa A , Roine R. 2004.Evidence for the benefits of telecardiology applications: A systematic review.Alberta Heritage Found Med Res.
2. Insall JN , Dorr LD , Scott RD , Scott WN .1989 Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system.Clin Orthop Relat Res.248:13–14.
3. Gold MR , Russell LB , Siegel JE , Weinstein MC .1996.Cost-effectiveness in health and medicine.Oxford:Oxford University Press.
4. Elstein AS , Chapman GB , Chmiel JS , et al.2004 Agreement between prostate cancer patients and their clinicians about utilities and attribute importance.Health Expect.7:115–125.
5. Sintonen H. The 15D-measure of health-related quality of life. I. Reliability, validity and sensitivity of its health state descriptive system.National Centre for Health Program Evaluation,Working Paper 41, Melbourne 1994. Available at: http://www.buseco.monash.edu.au/centres/che/publications.php#rp .