The wicked problem of measuring real-world research impact: Using sustainable development goals (SDGs) and targets in academia

Author:

Chapman Geoffrey R.ORCID,Cully AshleyORCID,Kosiol JenniferORCID,Macht Stephanie A.ORCID,Chapman Ross L.ORCID,Fitzgerald Janna AnnekeORCID,Gertsen FrankORCID

Abstract

AbstractThis paper proposes that the United Nation's sustainable development goals (SDGs) and associated targets form an effective framework for determining real-world research impact. Existing bibliometrics that assess the quality of academic work are usually quantitative and self-referential, reducing the focus on real-world issues. The same measurements are often adopted by funding bodies, pressuring researchers to increase compliance, and further reducing integrity and real-world impact. A series of world cafés were conducted, collecting data on how researchers, their institutions, and network organisations can contribute to, and measure research aligned with the SDGs and targets. The results showed that participants were generally positive towards using the SDGs and targets to measure impact and quality of academic research. Suggestions to assist greater adoption of the SDGs and targets as a measure of impact included: aligning governmental and institutional funding; changing key performance indicators; increasing cross-disciplinary work; aligning mission/vision statements; and legitimising SDG-focused projects at conferences.

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Subject

Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Business and International Management

Reference55 articles.

1. Australian Research Council [ARC] (2015b) Engagement and impact assessment, available at: https://www.arc.gov.au/engagement-and-impact-assessment. Accessed 02 January 2020.

2. Reconceptualising research impact: reflections on the real-world impact of research in an Australian context

3. Use the World Café concept to create an interactive learning environment

4. Why care about impact?;McKiernan;EFMD Global Focus,2017

5. Hughes, A. (2012). Enhancing impact: the value of public sector R&D: summary report: council for industry and higher education.

Cited by 29 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3