Author:
McCarthy Gregory J.,Welton Jean M.
Abstract
AbstractThe Powder Diffraction File (PDF) X-ray diffraction pattern for SnO2 (cassiterite, syn), determined in the early 1950's at the National Bureau of Standards, was evaluated using the NBS*AIDS83 editorial review program and a calculated powder pattern. Systematic errors in d-spacings and relative intensities were attributed to the lack of an iterative least-squares refinement of unit cell parameters, to inadequate precision in reporting d-spacings, to poor sensitivity to high angle reflections, and to detector dead time. A new SnO2 pattern was prepared and used to illustrate criteria for evaluation of powder patterns. An R-Factor for quantifying agreement between observed and calculated relative intensities was utilized. The systematic errors in the earlier pattern occurred at higher angles and did not hinder its usefulness for identification purposes.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Condensed Matter Physics,Instrumentation,General Materials Science,Radiation
Reference19 articles.
1. Methods of Producing Standard X-Ray Diffraction Powder Patterns
2. Standard Reference Material 674 (1983). X-Ray Powder Diffraction Intensity Set. To obtain, see procedure above for SRM 640a.
3. Garvey R.G. (1988). PDFEAPC. MS-DOS implementation of NBS*AIDS83, obtainable from the JCPDS-ICDD.
4. RIR - Measurement and Use in Quantitative XRD
Cited by
128 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献