Abstract
Abstract
We apply an intersectional framework to explore how connections to marginalized communities interact with candidate demographics to shape vote choice in U.S. politics. In an original experiment manipulating candidates’ race, gender, sexuality, and endorsements, we show that endorsements by organizations advocating for marginalized communities shape voter evaluations to the same, if not greater, degree as candidate demographics. Moreover, the effects are particularly pronounced for candidates receiving an endorsement from an LGBT advocacy organization. Attitudes toward marginalized communities are mapped onto candidates with ties to those communities, whether the candidate is a member or not; we call this process associational affect. Identity has a complex role in shaping vote choice, and, absent an investigation of power and interlocking social hierarchies, it alone is insufficient to explain vote choice.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Sociology and Political Science,Gender Studies,Sociology and Political Science,Gender Studies
Reference58 articles.
1. Political Experience and the Intersection between Race and Gender;Carey;Politics, Groups, and Identities,2019
2. The Impact of Explicit Racial Cues on Gender Differences in Support for Confederate Symbols and Partisanship;Hutchings;The Journal of Politics,2010
3. Combahee River Collective. 1977. “A Black Feminist Statement.” https://monthlyreview.org/2019/01/01/a-black-feminist-statement/ (accessed November 10, 2023). [Originally published in Zillah Eisenstein, ed. 1979. Capitalist Patriarchy and the Case for Socialist Feminism. New York: Monthly Review Press, 362–72.]
4. Racialized Media Coverage of Minority Candidates in the 2008 Democratic Presidential Primary;McIlwain;American Behavioral Scientist,2011