Self-Segregation or Deliberation? Blog Readership, Participation, and Polarization in American Politics

Author:

Lawrence Eric,Sides John,Farrell Henry

Abstract

Political scientists and political theorists debate the relationship between participation and deliberation among citizens with different political viewpoints. Blogs provide an important testing ground for their claims. We examine deliberation, polarization, and political participation among blog readers. We find that blog readers gravitate toward blogs that accord with their political beliefs. Few read blogs on both the left and right of the ideological spectrum. Furthermore, those who read left-wing blogs and those who read right-wing blogs are ideologically far apart. Blog readers are more polarized than either non-blog-readers or consumers of various television news programs, and roughly as polarized as US senators. Blog readers also participate more in politics than non-blog readers. Readers of blogs of different ideological dispositions do not participate less than those who read only blogs of one ideological disposition. Instead, readers of both left- and right-wing blogs and readers of exclusively leftwing blogs participate at similar levels, and both participate more than readers of exclusively right-wing blogs. This may reflect social movement-building efforts by left-wing bloggers.

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Subject

Political Science and International Relations

Reference63 articles.

1. Online Groups and Political Discourse: Do Online Discussion Spaces Facilitate Exposure to Political Disagreement?

2. New competencies in democratic communication? Blogs, agenda setting and political participation

3. Rosenblum Nancy L. 2009. “Responses on Political Theory, Idealism, and Extremism.” Cato Unbound. http://www.cato-unbound.org/2009/02/11/nancy-rosenblum/responses-on-political-theory-idealism-and-extremism/.

4. Ansolabehere Stephen . 2006. Cooperative Congressional Election Study, Common Content. [Computer File] Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. [producer] http://web.mit.edu/polisci/portl/cces/commoncontent.html (Release 2: November 14, 2007).

Cited by 249 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. A Multifaceted Approach at Discerning Redditors Feelings Towards ChatGPT;EAI Endorsed Transactions on Internet of Things;2024-06-28

2. Voices in the digital storm: Unraveling online polarization with ChatGPT;Technology in Society;2024-06

3. Perceived Political Polarization and its Differential Impact on Political Participation: Evidence from Japan (2005–2019);Journal of East Asian Studies;2024-05-30

4. What Explains Shareholder Voting?;Hard Lessons in Corporate Governance;2024-05-30

5. What Do We Know about Corporate Governance Practices?;Hard Lessons in Corporate Governance;2024-05-30

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3