Author:
Jones Gary,Richardson Miles
Abstract
AbstractObjectivePrevious research on nutrition labelling has mainly used subjective measures. This study examines the effectiveness of two types of nutrition label using two objective measures: eye movements and healthiness ratings.DesignEye movements were recorded while participants made healthiness ratings for two types of nutrition label: standard and standard plus the Food Standards Agency's ‘traffic light’ concept.SettingUniversity of Derby, UK.SubjectsA total of 92 participants (mean age 31.5 years) were paid for their participation. None of the participants worked in the areas of food or nutrition.ResultsFor the standard nutrition label, participant eye movements lacked focus and their healthiness ratings lacked accuracy. The traffic light system helped to guide the attention of the consumer to the important nutrients and improved the accuracy of the healthiness ratings of nutrition labels.ConclusionsConsumers have a lack of knowledge regarding how to interpret nutrition information for standard labels. The traffic light concept helps to ameliorate this problem by indicating important nutrients to which to pay attention.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Nutrition and Dietetics,Medicine (miscellaneous)
Reference13 articles.
1. The burden of food related ill health in the UK
2. 8 Food Standards Agency. Concept Testing of Alternative Labelling of Healthy/Less Healthy Foods [online], 2004. Available at http://www.food.gov.uk/multimedia/pdfs/alternlab.pdf.
3. 11 Rayner M , Scarborough P , Stockley L . Nutrient Profiles: Options for Definitions for Use in Relation to Food Promotion and Children's Diets: Final Report [online], 2004. Available at http://www.food.gov.uk/multimedia/pdfs/nutrientprofilingfullreport.pdf.
4. The origin of Guideline Daily Amounts and the Food Standards Agency's guidance on what counts as ‘a lot’ and ‘a little’