Author:
DIKMEN SUREYYA S.,HEATON ROBERT K.,GRANT IGOR,TEMKIN NANCY R.
Abstract
Test–retest reliabilities and practice effects
of a broad range of neuropsychological measures were examined
in 384 normal or neurologically stable adults. Median test–retest
interval was 11 months (range 3–16 months). The reliability
estimates for most of the measures are reasonably good,
ranging from .70 to low .90s. An exception is the relatively
poor reliabilities of most memory measures. For all test
measures, the value on initial testing is a strong determinant
of the value on the second examination. Practice effects
are seen on most measures. The magnitude of the practice
effects, however, varies as a function of type of measure,
test–retest interval, age, and overall competency
level of the participant. This study provides several types
of retest information that may be useful for future research
and clinical work: comparative reliabilities of the various
measures, estimate of error variability associated with
each administration, standard deviation of the change,
and comparative magnitude of practice effects on various
tests. (JINS, 1999, 5, 346–356.)
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Psychiatry and Mental health,Neurology (clinical),Clinical Psychology,General Neuroscience
Cited by
377 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献