Abstract
Abstract
As part of its response to Covid-19 the government paused the use of the ‘Minimum Income Floor’ (MIF), which restricts the Universal Credit (UC) entitlement of the self-employed. This paper places the MIF in the wider context of conditionality in the social security system and considers a judicial review which claimed that the MIF was discriminatory. The paper focuses on how UC affects the availability of real choices for low-income citizens to limit or escape from wage labour, with two implications of the move to UC highlighted. First, the overlooked labour decommodifying aspect of tax credits, which provided a minimum income guarantee and a genuine alternative to wage labour for people who self-designated as ‘self-employed’, even if their earnings were minimal or non-existent, has been removed. Secondly, UC has in some respects improved the position of low-paid wage labourers in ‘mini-jobs’, who are not subject to conditionality once they work for the equivalent of approximately nine hours a week on the minimum wage.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Reference17 articles.
1. A hand up or a slap down? Criminalising benefit claimants in Britain via strategies of surveillance, sanctions and deterrence;Fletcher;Critical Social Policy,2018
2. The Ethical Deficit of the United Kingdom's Proposed Universal Credit: Pimping the Precariat?
3. The Case for a Participation Income
4. Benefits “broods”: the cultural and political crafting of anti-welfare commonsense;Tyler;Critical Policy Studies,2015
5. “Done because we are too menny” the two-child rule promotes poverty…;O'Brien;International Journal of Children's Rights,2018
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献