Consensus Standard for Evidence Integration into EMS Education and High-Stakes Testing

Author:

Gage Christopher B.ORCID,Terry Mark,McKenna Kim D.,Powell Jonathan R.,Hollern Megan,Ozanich Matt,Richards Christopher T.,Martin-Gill Christian,Panchal Ashish R.

Abstract

AbstractBackground:Incorporating emerging knowledge into Emergency Medical Service (EMS) competency assessments is critical to reflect current evidence-based out-of-hospital care. However, a standardized approach is needed to incorporate new evidence into EMS competency assessments because of the rapid pace of knowledge generation.Objective:The objective was to develop a framework to evaluate and integrate new source material into EMS competency assessments.Methods:The National Registry of Emergency Medical Technicians (National Registry) and the Prehospital Guidelines Consortium (PGC) convened a panel of experts. A Delphi method, consisting of virtual meetings and electronic surveys, was used to develop a Table of Evidence matrix that defines sources of EMS evidence. In Round One, participants listed all potential sources of evidence available to inform EMS education. In Round Two, participants categorized these sources into: (a) levels of evidence quality; and (b) type of source material. In Round Three, the panel revised a proposed Table of Evidence. Finally, in Round Four, participants provided recommendations on how each source should be incorporated into competency assessments depending on type and quality. Descriptive statistics were calculated with qualitative analyses conducted by two independent reviewers and a third arbitrator.Results:In Round One, 24 sources of evidence were identified. In Round Two, these were classified into high- (n = 4), medium- (n = 15), and low-quality (n = 5) of evidence, followed by categorization by purpose into providing recommendations (n = 10), primary research (n = 7), and educational content (n = 7). In Round Three, the Table of Evidence was revised based on participant feedback. In Round Four, the panel developed a tiered system of evidence integration from immediate incorporation of high-quality sources to more stringent requirements for lower-quality sources.Conclusion:The Table of Evidence provides a framework for the rapid and standardized incorporation of new source material into EMS competency assessments. Future goals are to evaluate the application of the Table of Evidence framework in initial and continued competency assessments.

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Subject

Emergency Nursing,Emergency Medicine

Reference25 articles.

1. 3. National Association of EMS Physicians (NAEMSP). Prehospital Guidelines Consortium (PGC). https://naemsp.org/resources/prehospital-guidelines-consortium/. Accessed January 2023.

2. How Good Is the Quality of Health Care in the United States?

3. 13. Alchemer, LLC. https://www.alchemer.com/. Accessed January 2023.

4. 22. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). Emergency Medical Services Agenda for the Future. https://www.ems.gov/pdf/advancing-ems-systems/Provider-Resources/EMS_Agenda_For_The_Future_2010.pdf. Accessed January 2023.

5. 10. National Registry of Emergency Medical Technicians. https://www.nremt.org/. Accessed January 2023.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Training for High-Stakes Domains;Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting;2023-09

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3