Comparison of lambing outcome in ewes after synchronization of oestrus by progestagen or prostaglandin treatment

Abstract

It has been shown (Gordon, 1975) that certain progestagens administered intravaginally can be highly effective in the control of oestrus, ovulation and fertility in ewes. Prostaglandin (PGF2α) when infused into the uterine vein ipsilateral to the ovary containing the corpus luteum has been shown to result in luetolysis and a return to oestrus in a high proportion of ewes (Hearnshaw, Restall & Gleeson, 1973). Synthetic analogues of PGF2α have also been shown to have a marked luteolytic effect in ewes (Baird & Scaramuzzi, 1975). Variable fertility has been reported following the use of prostaglandin or its analogue for oestrous synchronization (Jennings, 1975; Haresign, 1976; Fairnie, Cumming & Martin, 1976; Lightfoot, Croker & Marshall, 1976; Trounson, Willadsen & Moor, 1976). Low fertilization has been reported after the use of a prostaglandin analogue and artificial insemination at a predetermined time in ewes (Boland, Gordon & Kelleher, 1978). The purpose of the present experiment was to extend these observations, using a ram in natural service after employing a double prostaglandin injection regime or an intravaginal progestagen treatment for the control of oestrus in cyclic sheep.