Abstract
Abstract
Recent years have seen a heightened interest in the interface between language use and cognition in language learners. In this study, we investigate this interface further by conducting a rating task experiment on the intuitions of 25 native speakers and 101 low–intermediate to advanced learners of English as a Foreign Language regarding the acceptability of the genitive variants (the beauty of nature/nature’s beauty) in different contexts. These ratings were then compared against existing corpus-based statistical models that predict which variant is most likely in spoken language use with two mixed-effects linear regression models. The first model focused on the animacy of the possessor in particular, which has been found to have a different effect on native speakers and EFL learners in language use, whereas the second model tested how the ratings relate to the predictions as a whole. Results show that there is a larger discrepancy between language use and intuitions of low-proficiency learners compared to native speakers, which is partially because animate, collective, and inanimate possessors affect the intuitions and the language use of learners differently.
Funder
Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Linguistics and Language,Experimental and Cognitive Psychology,Language and Linguistics
Reference54 articles.
1. R Core Team. (2022). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/.
2. Assessing the complexity of lectal competence: the register-specificity of the dative alternation after give
3. The cognitive plausibility of statistical classification models: Comparing textual and behavioral evidence
4. Pitting corpus-based classification models against each other: A case study for predicting constructional choice in written Estonian;Klavan;Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory,2020
5. Cognitive Perspectives on SLA