COMPARISON OF PAIN LEVELS BETWEEN THE CONVENTIONAL AND THE COMPUTERIZED ANESTHETIC INJECTION WITH MORPHEUS® FOR THE NASOPALATINE NERVE BLOCK: A DOUBLE-BLIND RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL

Author:

Santos André Luis Silva,Gouveia Gustavo Nascimento,Oliveira Iris Tamara de Santana,Silva Lorena Sommer,Rios Monique Lorem Souza,Freire Rangel Teles,Pinho John Nadson Andrade,Souza Liane Maciel de Almeida

Abstract

Objective: To compare pain levels between the conventional injection and the Morpheus® device for the nasopalatine nerve block concerning the puncture, needle introduction, and local anesthetic (LA) deposition. Methods: A crossover, double-blind, randomized clinical trial was carried out involving 32 participants. Group I comprised the conventional syringe (control group), while Group II comprised the Morpheus® device (experimental group). The study was developed in two sessions, two weeks apart. The pain was assessed using a 100-mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The intragroup analyses were performed using Friedman’s test and Durbin-Conover's post hoc test. The Wilcoxon test was used for intergroup analyses. The significance level was set at p < 0.05. Results: Intragroup analyses showed statistical differences within both groups (Group I, p < 0.001; Group II, p = 0.003). All the evaluated moments of both injection techniques differed statistically, except between the needle introduction and LA deposition within Group II (p = 0.526). In the intergroup analyses, participants of Group I presented higher pain levels, experiencing the highest pain at the LA deposition moment (median 58; 46 - 62). Pain levels were statistically significant between all the corresponding moments of the groups (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Computerized injection with the Morpheus® can be effectively employed to increase comfort during anesthetic injections and patient compliance with dental treatments.

Publisher

South Florida Publishing LLC

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3