Author:
Weaver Kari,Mercer Kate,Mutch Stephanie
Abstract
This paper explores the connection between critical theory, information evaluation, and the instructional practice of critique for STEM students and librarian instructors. Using an emerging theory and instructional method, the authors examine how to more deeply include voices that have historically been excluded from STEM information critique. The foundational ideas, pedagogical approaches, and scaffolded curriculum used to engender a more inclusive approach to information within third- and fourth-year engineering design classes are discussed to contextualize the application of theory to the practical setting. Rooted in critical theory, this case considers how student information behaviors can ultimately perpetuate or subvert social structures and expectations.
Publisher
University of Alberta Libraries
Reference33 articles.
1. Alam, F., & Kootookos, A. (2020). Engineering education: Accreditation and graduate global mobility. CRC Press.
2. Badke, W. (2011). Why information literacy is invisible. Communications in Information Literacy, 4(2), 129–141. https://doi.org/10.15760/comminfolit.2011.4.2.92
3. Bhattacharya, K. (2016). The vulnerable academic: Personal narratives and strategic de/colonizing of academic structures. Qualitative Inquiry, 22(5), 309–321. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800415615619
4. Borland, M. & Mercer, K. (2022, Dec. 7–9). Introducing critique to enhance evaluation in traditional design courses [Conference session]. Canadian Design Workshop, Waterloo, ON, Canada. https://uwaterloo.ca/canadian-design-workshop/cdw1-schedule
5. Canadian Engineering Accreditation Board. (2022, October). 2022 accreditation criteria and procedures. Engineers Canada. https://engineerscanada.ca/sites/default/files/2022-11/Accreditation_Criteria_Procedures_2022.pdf