The effect of prenatal balanced energy and protein supplementation on gestational weight gain: An individual participant data meta-analysis in low- and middle-income countries

Author:

Wang DongqingORCID,Partap UttaraORCID,Liu Enju,Costa Janaína CaluORCID,Cliffer Ilana R.ORCID,Wang Molin,Nookala Sudeer Kumar,Subramoney Vishak,Briggs BrittanyORCID,Ahmed Imran,Argaw AlemayehuORCID,Ariff Shabina,Bhandari Nita,Chowdhury RanadipORCID,Erchick DanielORCID,García-Guerra ArmandoORCID,Ghaffarpour Masoumah,Hanley-Cook GilesORCID,Huybregts Lieven,Jehan Fyezah,Kaseb Fatemeh,Krebs Nancy F.,Lachat CarlORCID,Lama Tsering PemaORCID,Manandhar Dharma S.,McClure Elizabeth M.,Moore Sophie E.ORCID,Muhammad AmeerORCID,Neufeld Lynnette M.,Prentice Andrew M.ORCID,Quezada-Sánchez Amado D.ORCID,Roberfroid DominiqueORCID,Saville Naomi M.ORCID,Shafiq YasirORCID,Shrestha Bhim P.,Sonko BakaryORCID,Soofi Sajid,Taneja SunitaORCID,Tielsch James M.,Toe Laéticia Céline,Valaei Naser,Fawzi Wafaie W.

Abstract

Background Understanding the effects of balanced energy and protein (BEP) supplements on gestational weight gain (GWG) and how the effects differ depending on maternal characteristics and the nutritional composition of the supplements will inform the implementation of prenatal BEP interventions. Methods and findings Individual participant data from 11 randomized controlled trials of prenatal BEP supplements (N = 12,549, with 5,693 in the BEP arm and 6,856 in the comparison arm) in low- and middle-income countries were used. The primary outcomes included GWG adequacy (%) and the estimated total GWG at delivery as continuous outcomes, and severely inadequate (<70% adequacy), inadequate GWG (<90% adequacy), and excessive GWG (>125% adequacy) as binary outcomes; all variables were calculated based on the Institute of Medicine recommendations. Linear and log-binomial models were used to estimate study-specific mean differences or risk ratios (RRs), respectively, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of the effects of prenatal BEP on the GWG outcomes. The study-specific estimates were pooled using meta-analyses. Subgroup analyses were conducted by individual characteristics. Subgroup analyses and meta-regression were conducted for study-level characteristics. Compared to the comparison group, prenatal BEP led to a 6% greater GWG percent adequacy (95% CI: 2.18, 9.56; p = 0.002), a 0.59 kg greater estimated total GWG at delivery (95% CI, 0.12, 1.05; p = 0.014), a 10% lower risk of severely inadequate GWG (RR: 0.90; 95% CI: 0.83, 0.99; p = 0.025), and a 7% lower risk of inadequate GWG (RR: 0.93; 95% CI: 0.89, 0.97; p = 0.001). The effects of prenatal BEP on GWG outcomes were stronger in studies with a targeted approach, where BEP supplements were provided to participants in the intervention arm under specific criteria such as low body mass index or low GWG, compared to studies with an untargeted approach, where BEP supplements were provided to all participants allocated to the intervention arm. Conclusions Prenatal BEP supplements are effective in increasing GWG and reducing the risk of inadequate weight gain during pregnancy. BEP supplementation targeted toward pregnant women with undernutrition may be a promising approach to delivering the supplements.

Funder

Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation

Publisher

Public Library of Science (PLoS)

Reference58 articles.

1. A systematic review of outcomes of maternal weight gain according to the Institute of Medicine recommendations: birthweight, fetal growth, and postpartum weight retention.;AM Siega-Riz;Am J Obstet Gynecol,2009

2. Association of gestational weight gain with maternal and infant outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis;RF Goldstein;JAMA,2017

3. Suboptimal gestational weight gain and neonatal outcomes in low and middle income countries: individual participant data meta-analysis;N Perumal;BMJ,2023

4. Low gestational weight gain and the risk of preterm birth and low birthweight: a systematic review and meta-analyses.;Z Han;Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand,2011

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.7亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2025 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3