Structural congenital anomalies in resource limited setting, 2023: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Author:

Geda Yohannes FikaduORCID,Lamiso Yirgalem Yosef,Berhe Tamirat Melis,Mohammed Seid Jemal,Chibsa Samuel EjetaORCID,Adeba Tadesse Sahle,Mossa Kenzudin Assfa,Abeje Seblework,Gesese Molalegn Mesele

Abstract

Background A number of studies have looked at neonatal structural birth defects. However, there is no study with a comprehensive review of structural anomalies. Therefor we aimed to verify the best available articles to pool possible risk factors of structural congenital anomalies in resource limited settings. Setting Genuine search of the research articles was done via PubMed, Scopes, Cochrane library, the Web of Science; free Google database search engines, Google Scholar, and Science Direct databases. Published and unpublished articles were searched and screened for inclusion in the final analysis and Studies without sound methodologies, and review and meta-analysis were not included in this analysis. Participants This review analyzed data from 95,755 women who have birthed from as reported by primary studies. Ten articles were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. Articles which have no full information important for the analysis and case reports were excluded from the study. Results The overall pooled effect estimate of structural congenital anomalies was 5.50 [4.88–6.12]. In this systematic review and meta-analysis maternal illness effect estimate (EI) with odds ratio (OR) = 4.93 (95%CI 1.02–8.85), unidentified drug use OR = 2.83 (95%CI 1.19–4.46), birth weight OR = 4.20 (95%CI 2.12–6.28), chewing chat OR = 3.73 (95%CI 1.20–6.30), chemical exposure OR = 4.27 (95%CI 1.19–8.44) and taking folic acid tablet during pregnancy OR = 6.01 (95%CI 2.87–14.89) were statistically significant in this meta-regression. Conclusions The overall pooled effect estimate of structural congenital anomalies in a resource limited setting was high compared to better resource countries. On the Meta-regression maternal illness, unidentified drug use, birth weight, chewing chat, chemical exposure and never using folic acid were found to be statistically significant variables Preconception care and adequate intake of folic acid before and during early pregnancy should be advised.

Publisher

Public Library of Science (PLoS)

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference56 articles.

1. WHO. World Health Organization. Birth Defects Surveillance Training. 2016.

2. WHO. World Health Organization, Congenital anomalies. 2016.

3. C. B. Birth defects: epidemiology, types, and patterns. UpToDate; 2017. Accessed July 2, 2018. 2018. https://www.uptodate.com/contents/birth-defects-epidemiology-types-and-patterns

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3