Labor curves based on cervical dilatation over time and their accuracy and effectiveness: A systematic scoping review

Author:

Huurnink Johanne Mamohau EgenbergORCID,Blix Ellen,Hals Elisabeth,Kaasen Anne,Bernitz StineORCID,Lavender Tina,Ahlberg Mia,Øian Pål,Høifødt Aase Irene,Miltenburg Andrea Solnes,Pay Aase Serine DevoldORCID

Abstract

Objectives This systematic scoping review was conducted to 1) identify and describe labor curves that illustrate cervical dilatation over time; 2) map any evidence for, as well as outcomes used to evaluate the accuracy and effectiveness of the curves; and 3) identify areas in research that require further investigation. Methods A three-step systematic literature search was conducted for publications up to May 2023. We searched the Medline, Maternity & Infant Care, Embase, Cochrane Library, Epistemonikos, CINAHL, Scopus, and African Index Medicus databases for studies describing labor curves, assessing their effectiveness in improving birth outcomes, or assessing their accuracy as screening or diagnostic tools. Original research articles and systematic reviews were included. We excluded studies investigating adverse birth outcomes retrospectively, and those investigating the effect of analgesia-related interventions on labor progression. Study eligibility was assessed, and data were extracted from included studies using a piloted charting form. The findings are presented according to descriptive summaries created for the included studies. Results and implications for research Of 26,073 potentially eligible studies, 108 studies were included. Seventy-three studies described labor curves, of which ten of the thirteen largest were based mainly on the United States Consortium on Safe Labor cohort. Labor curve endpoints were 10 cm cervical dilatation in 69 studies and vaginal birth in 4 studies. Labor curve accuracy was assessed in 26 studies, of which all 15 published after 1986 were from low- and middle–income countries. Recent studies of labor curve accuracy in high-income countries are lacking. The effectiveness of labor curves was assessed in 13 studies, which failed to prove the superiority of any curve. Patient-reported health and well-being is an underrepresented outcome in evaluations of labor curves. The usefulness of labor curves is still a matter of debate, as studies have failed to prove their accuracy or effectiveness.

Publisher

Public Library of Science (PLoS)

Reference131 articles.

1. World Health Organization partograph in management of labour. World Health Organization Maternal Health and Safe Motherhood Programme.;World Health Organization;Lancet (London, England).,1994

2. Diagnostic accuracy of the partograph alert and action lines to predict adverse birth outcomes: a systematic review. BJOG;M Bonet;An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology,2019

3. Cervical dilatation over time is a poor predictor of severe adverse birth outcomes: a diagnostic accuracy study.;JP Souza;BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology.,2018

4. Cervical dilatation patterns of ’low-risk’ women with spontaneous labour and normal perinatal outcomes: a systematic review.;OT Oladapo;BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology.,2018

5. The graphic analysis of labor. American Journal of Obstetrics &;EA Friedman;Gynecology,1954

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3