Interdisciplinary interventions that improve patient-reported outcomes in perioperative cancer care: A systematic review of randomized control trials

Author:

Maheta Bhagvat J.ORCID,Singh Nainwant K.,Lorenz Karl A.,Fereydooni Sarina,Dy Sydney M.,Wong Hong-nei,Bergman Jonathan,Leppert John T.ORCID,Giannitrapani Karleen F.ORCID

Abstract

Introduction Interdisciplinary teams are often leveraged to improve quality of cancer care in the perioperative period. We aimed to identify the team structures and processes in interdisciplinary interventions that improve perioperative patient-reported outcomes for patients with cancer. Methods We searched PubMed, EMBASE, and CINAHL for randomized control trials published at any time and screened 7,195 articles. To be included in our review, studies needed to report patient-reported outcomes, have interventions that occur in the perioperative period, include surgical cancer treatment, and include at least one non physician intervention clinical team member: advanced practice providers, including nurse practitioners and physician assistants, clinical nurse specialists, and registered nurses. We narratively synthesized intervention components, specifically roles assumed by intervention clinical team members and interdisciplinary team processes, to compare interventions that improved patient-reported outcomes, based on minimal clinically important difference and statistical significance. Results We included 34 studies with a total of 4,722 participants, of which 31 reported a clinically meaningful improvement in at least one patient-reported outcome. No included studies had an overall high risk of bias. The common clinical team member roles featured patient education regarding diagnosis, treatment, coping, and pain/symptom management as well as postoperative follow up regarding problems after surgery, resource dissemination, and care planning. Other intervention components included six or more months of continuous clinical team member contact with the patient and involvement of the patient’s caregiver. Conclusions Future interventions might prioritize supporting clinical team members roles to include patient education, caregiver engagement, and clinical follow-up.

Funder

U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs

Publisher

Public Library of Science (PLoS)

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference96 articles.

1. Teamwork in healthcare: Key discoveries enabling safer, high-quality care;M. A. Rosen;American Psychologist,2018

2. Perspective—Rethinking Teams: From Bounded Membership to Dynamic Participation;M. Mortensen;Organization Science,,2018

3. Cross-boundary teaming for innovation: Integrating research on teams and knowledge in organizations;A. C. Edmondson;Human Resource Management Review,2018

4. Teaming: An Approach to the Growing Complexities in Health Care: AOA Critical Issues;H. Nawaz;The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery-American Volume,2014

5. The Anatomy and Physiology of Teaming in Cancer Care Delivery: A Conceptual Framework.;D. C. Verhoeven;JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute,2021

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3