Abstract
This paper estimated the impact of intervention effects (state of emergency (SOE) or quasi-SOE requirements) and information effects (publicized increases in the number of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) deaths and fear of infection) on preventive behaviors and telecommuting during the COVID-19 pandemic using the Japan Household Panel Survey. Our results indicated that SOEs and quasi-SOEs had positive effects on the adoption of preventive behaviors among individuals, including handwashing, which indicates that an SOE has a direct effect and an indirect effect. Although SOEs in Japan were less enforceable and more lenient than those in other countries, they still had a certain effect on people’s adoption of preventive behaviors. However, the contribution of information effects was much larger than that of intervention effects, suggesting the importance of how and when information should be communicated to the public to prevent the spread of infection.
Funder
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Reference26 articles.
1. Fear, lockdown, and diversion: Comparing drivers of pandemic economic decline 2020;A Goolsbee;Journal of Public Economics,2021
2. Japan’s voluntary lockdown;T Watanabe;PLoS ONE
3. Japan’s voluntary lockdown: further evidence based on age-specific mobile location data;T Watanabe;The Japanese Economic Review,2021
4. Japan Household Panel Survey (JHPS/KHPS) Sampling Weights;MS Chang;PDRC Discussion Paper Series,2022
5. Impact of socioeconomic- and lifestyle-related risk factors on poor mental health conditions: A nationwide longitudinal 5-wave panel study in Japan;M Nagasu;PLoS ONE,2020