Pharmaceutical industry payments to NHS trusts in England: A four-year analysis of the Disclosure UK database

Author:

Ozieranski PiotrORCID,Saghy EszterORCID,Mulinari ShaiORCID

Abstract

Introduction Although hospitals are key health service providers, their financial ties to drug companies are little understood. We examine non-research pharmaceutical industry payments to English National Health Service (NHS) trusts—hospital groupings providing secondary and tertiary care. Methods We extracted data from the industry-run Disclosure UK database, analysing it descriptively and using the Jonckheere-Terpstra test to establish whether a statistically significant time trend existed in the median values of individual payments. We explained payment value and number per trust with random effects models, using selected trust characteristics as predictors. Results Drug companies reported paying £60,253,421 to 234 trusts, representing between 90.0% and 92.0% of all trusts in England between 2015 and 2018. As a share of payments to all healthcare organisations, the number of payments rose from 38.6% to 39.5%, but their value dropped from 33.0% to 23.6%. The number of payments for fees for service and consultancy and contributions to costs of events increased by 61.5% and 29.4%. The median payment value decreased significantly for trusts overall (from £2,250.8 to £1,758.5), including those with lower autonomy from central government; providing acute services; and from half of England’s regions. The random effects model showed that acute trusts received significantly more money on average than trusts with all other service profiles; and trusts from East England received significantly less than those from London. However, trusts enjoying greater autonomy from government did not receive significantly more money than others. Trusts also received significantly less money in 2018 than in 2015. Conclusion NHS trusts had extensive pharmaceutical industry ties but were losing importance as payment targets relative to other healthcare organisations. Industry payment strategies shifted towards events sponsorship, consultancies, and smaller payments. Trusts with specific service and geographical profiles were prioritised. Understanding corporate payments across the health system requires more granular disclosure data.

Funder

Vetenskapsrådet

Publisher

Public Library of Science (PLoS)

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference132 articles.

1. Ten years later: a review of the US 2009 institute of medicine report on conflicts of interest and solutions for further reform;T Torgerson;BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine,2020

2. Association of Pharmaceutical Industry Marketing of Opioid Products With Mortality From Opioid-Related Overdoses;SE Hadland;JAMA Network Open,2019

3. Pharmaceutical industry payments to physicians for the promotion of cancer drugs;AP Mitchell;Journal of Clinical Oncology,2022

4. Association between payments from manufacturers of pharmaceuticals to physicians and regional prescribing: cross sectional ecological study;W Fleischman;BMJ,2016

5. Are Financial Payments From the Pharmaceutical Industry Associated With Physician Prescribing?;AP Mitchell;Annals of Internal Medicine,2020

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3