Understanding the needs of women undergoing breast ultrasound: Are male radiologists still needed?

Author:

Sartoretti Elisabeth,Largiadèr Selina,Sartoretti ThomasORCID,Laures Simin,Walter Martin Alexander,Monti Eva,Füchsel Ina,Dettling Mira,Pfister Stephan,Dubsky Peter,Ort AlexanderORCID,Sartoretti-Schefer Sabine,Meissnitzer Matthias,Hergan Klaus,Forstner Rosemarie,Matoori Simon,Bech- Hohenberger Rasmus,Froehlich John M.,Plümecke Tino,Harder Dorothee,Koh Dow Mu,Gutzeit AndreasORCID

Abstract

Introduction A trend towards less male radiologists specializing in breast ultrasound was observed. A common notion in the field of breast radiology is, that female patients feel more comfortable being treated by female radiologists. The aim of the study was to understand and report the needs of women undergoing breast ultrasound with regards to the sex of the radiologist performing the investigation. Methods Informed consent was obtained from all patients prior to inclusion in a prospective bi-center quality study. At center 1 (72 patients), the women were examined exclusively by female radiologists, at center 2 (100 patients) only by male radiologists. After the examination the patients were asked about their experiences and their wishes for the future. Results Overall, women made no distinction between female and male radiologists; 25% of them wanted a female radiologist and 1.2% wanted a male radiologist. The majority (74%) stated that it made no difference whether a female or male radiologist performed the examination. The majority of women in group 2, who were investigated exclusively by male radiologists, stated that they had no preferences with regard to the sex of the radiologist (93%); 5% of the women wished to be investigated solely by a female radiologist and 2% exclusively by a male radiologist. Discussion The majority of women undergoing breast ultrasound are unconcerned about the radiologist’s sex. It would appear that women examined by male radiologists are less selective about the sex of the examining radiologist. Trial registration Written informed consent was obtained from all patients. All patient data were anonymized. The physicians had no access to any further personal data. National regulations did not require dedicated ethics approval with anonymized lists or retrospective questionnaires.

Publisher

Public Library of Science (PLoS)

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference25 articles.

1. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Breast Cancer Screening.;Expert Panel on Breast Imaging;J Am Coll Radiol,2017

2. Screening for Breast Cancer.;BL Niell;Radiol Clin North Am,2017

3. Is It Time for a "Me-Too" Movement Against Attitudes Towards Women Suffering from Nongynecological Malignancies?;R Shashar;J Cancer Educ,2021

4. "Helping Somebody Else Has Helped Me Too": Resilience in Rural Women With Disabilities With Experiences of Interpersonal Violence.;K Aguillard;J Interpers Violence.,2021

5. Gender bias in the medical education of obstetrician-gynaecologists in the United States: A systematic review.;BT Nguyen;Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol.,2022

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3