ELBW and ELGAN outcomes in developing nations–Systematic review and meta-analysis

Author:

Ramaswamy Viraraghavan Vadakkencherry,Abiramalatha Thangaraj,Bandyopadhyay TapasORCID,Shaik Nasreen Banu,Bandiya Prathik,Nanda Debasish,Pullattayil S. Abdul KareemORCID,Murki Srinivas,Roehr Charles Christoph

Abstract

Context Morbidity and mortality amongst extremely low birth weight (ELBW) and extremely low gestational age neonates (ELGANs) in developing nations has not been well studied. Objectives Evaluate survival until discharge, short- and long-term morbidities of ELBW and ELGANs in LMICs. Data sources CENTRAL, EMBASE, MEDLINE and Web of Science. Study selection Prospective and retrospective observational studies were included. Data extraction and synthesis Four authors extracted data independently. Random-effects meta-analysis of proportions was used to synthesize data, modified QUIPS scale to evaluate quality of studies and GRADE approach to ascertain the certainty of evidence (CoE). Results 192 studies enrolling 22,278 ELBW and 18,338 ELGANs were included. Survival was 34% (95% CI: 31% - 37%) (CoE–low) for ELBW and 39% (34% - 44%) (CoE—moderate) for ELGANs. For ELBW neonates, the survival for low-income (LI), lower middle-income (LMI) and upper middle income (UMI) countries was 18% (11% - 28%), 28% (21% - 35%) and 39% (36% - 42%), respectively. For ELGANs, it was 13% (8% - 20%) for LI, 28% (21% - 36%) for LMI and 48% (42% - 53%) for UMI countries. There was no difference in survival between two epochs: 2000–2009 and 2010–2020. Except for necrotising enterocolitis [ELBW and ELGANs—8% (7% - 10%)] and periventricular leukomalacia [ELBW—7% (4% - 11%); ELGANs—6% (5%-7%)], rates of all other morbidities were higher compared to developed nations. Rates of neurodevelopmental impairment was 17% (7% - 34%) in ELBW neonates and 29% (23% - 37%) in ELGANs. Limitations CoE was very low to low for all secondary outcomes. Conclusions Mortality and morbidity amongst ELBW and ELGANs is still a significant burden in LMICs. CoE was very low to low for all the secondary outcomes, emphasizing the need for high quality prospective cohort studies. Trial registration PROSPERO (CRD42020222873).

Publisher

Public Library of Science (PLoS)

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference44 articles.

1. Global burden of preterm birth.;SR Walani;Int J Gynaecol Obstet,2020

2. WHO, March of Dimes, PMNCH, Save the Children. 15 million preterm births: Priorities for action based on national, regional and global estimates. In: Howson CP, Kinney MV, Lawn J, eds. Born Too Soon: The Global Action Report on Preterm Birth. 2012.

3. Global, regional, and national estimates of levels of preterm birth in 2014: A systematic review and modelling analysis;S Chawanpaiboon;Lancet Glob Health,2019

4. National, regional and worldwide estimates of preterm birth;H Blencowe;Lancet,2012

5. WHO, Every Newborn: an action plan to end preventable deaths. 2014 https://www.who.int/maternal_child_adolescent/documents/every-newborn-action-plan/en/ Accessed 10th January 2021.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3