Modeling geographic vaccination strategies for COVID-19 in Norway

Author:

Chan Louis Yat HinORCID,Rø Gunnar,Midtbø Jørgen ErikssonORCID,Di Ruscio Francesco,Watle Sara Sofie Viksmoen,Juvet Lene KristineORCID,Littmann Jasper,Aavitsland Preben,Nygård Karin Maria,Berg Are Stuwitz,Bukholm Geir,Kristoffersen Anja BråthenORCID,Engø-Monsen KenthORCID,Engebretsen SolveigORCID,Swanson David,Palomares Alfonso Diz-Lois,Lindstrøm Jonas Christoffer,Frigessi Arnoldo,de Blasio Birgitte Freiesleben

Abstract

Vaccination was a key intervention in controlling the COVID-19 pandemic globally. In early 2021, Norway faced significant regional variations in COVID-19 incidence and prevalence, with large differences in population density, necessitating efficient vaccine allocation to reduce infections and severe outcomes. This study explored alternative vaccination strategies to minimize health outcomes (infections, hospitalizations, ICU admissions, deaths) by varying regions prioritized, extra doses prioritized, and implementation start time. Using two models (individual-based and meta-population), we simulated COVID-19 transmission during the primary vaccination period in Norway, covering the first 7 months of 2021. We investigated alternative strategies to allocate more vaccine doses to regions with a higher force of infection. We also examined the robustness of our results and highlighted potential structural differences between the two models. Our findings suggest that early vaccine prioritization could reduce COVID-19 related health outcomes by 8% to 20% compared to a baseline strategy without geographic prioritization. For minimizing infections, hospitalizations, or ICU admissions, the best strategy was to initially allocate all available vaccine doses to fewer high-risk municipalities, comprising approximately one-fourth of the population. For minimizing deaths, a moderate level of geographic prioritization, with approximately one-third of the population receiving doubled doses, gave the best outcomes by balancing the trade-off between vaccinating younger people in high-risk areas and older people in low-risk areas. The actual strategy implemented in Norway was a two-step moderate level aimed at maintaining the balance and ensuring ethical considerations and public trust. However, it did not offer significant advantages over the baseline strategy without geographic prioritization. Earlier implementation of geographic prioritization could have more effectively addressed the main wave of infections, substantially reducing the national burden of the pandemic.

Funder

Norges Forskningsråd

Publisher

Public Library of Science (PLoS)

Subject

Computational Theory and Mathematics,Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience,Genetics,Molecular Biology,Ecology,Modeling and Simulation,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

Reference88 articles.

1. Early Transmission Dynamics in Wuhan, China, of Novel Coronavirus–Infected Pneumonia;Q Li;New England Journal of Medicine,2020

2. COVID-19 non-pharmaceutical intervention portfolio effectiveness and risk communication predominance;LYH Chan;Scientific reports,2021

3. One person has tested positive for coronavirus, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Norway;. Available from: https://www.fhi.no/en/archive/covid-19-archive/COVID-19-archived-news-from-2020/february/one-person-has-tested-positive-for-coronavirus/ [cited 19th October 2021].

4. Norwegian Directorate of Health implements the following today—from 6 p.m. on Thursday 12 March until Thursday 26 March 2020, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Norway;. Available from: https://www.fhi.no/en/archive/covid-19-archive/COVID-19-archived-news-from-2020/march/norwegian-directorate-of-health-implements-the-following-today---from-6-p.m/ [cited 19th October 2021].

5. Social distance and physical contact, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Norway;. Available from: https://www.fhi.no/en/archive/covid-19-archive/covid-19-guidance-archived-articles/social-distance-and-fewer-contacts/ [cited 19th October 2021].

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3