Abstract
In cognitive neuroscience and psychology, reaction times are an important behavioral measure. However, in instrumental learning and goal-directed decision making experiments, findings often rely only on choice probabilities from a value-based model, instead of reaction times. Recent advancements have shown that it is possible to connect value-based decision models with reaction time models. However, typically these models do not provide an integrated account of both value-based choices and reaction times, but simply link two types of models. Here, we propose a novel integrative joint model of both choices and reaction times by combining a computational account of Bayesian sequential decision making with a sampling procedure. This allows us to describe how internal uncertainty in the planning process shapes reaction time distributions. Specifically, we use a recent context-specific Bayesian forward planning model which we extend by a Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampler to obtain both choices and reaction times. As we will show this makes the sampler an integral part of the decision making process and enables us to reproduce, using simulations, well-known experimental findings in value based-decision making as well as classical inhibition and switching tasks. Specifically, we use the proposed model to explain both choice behavior and reaction times in instrumental learning and automatized behavior, in the Eriksen flanker task and in task switching. These findings show that the proposed joint behavioral model may describe common underlying processes in these different decision making paradigms.
Funder
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Sächsisches Staatsministerium für Wissenschaft und Kunst
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Reference82 articles.
1. Dysfunctions of decision-making and cognitive control as transdiagnostic mechanisms of mental disorders: advances, gaps, and needs in current research;T Goschke;International journal of methods in psychiatric research,2014
2. Dynamics of cognitive control: Theoretical bases, paradigms, and a view for the future;G Gratton;Psychophysiology,2018
3. The NIMH research domain criteria initiative: background, issues, and pragmatics;MJ Kozak;Psychophysiology,2016
4. Optimizing the use of information: strategic control of activation of responses;G Gratton;Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,1992
5. Conditional accuracy in response interference tasks: Evidence from the Eriksen flanker task and the spatial conflict task;JF Stins;Advances in cognitive psychology,2007