Political party affiliation, social identity cues, and attitudes about protective mask-wearing during the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany

Author:

Magnus Kathleen D.ORCID,Dammann Niklas,Ziegler Elâ,Lüdecke Daniel,Dingoyan Demet

Abstract

This cross-sectional study aimed to determine 1) whether German citizens’ adherence to health professionals’ recommendations and mandates regarding protective masks during the COVID-19 pandemic varied according to their political party affiliations, and 2) how behavioral cues provided by members of shared social groups, such as family and friends, influenced individual mask-wearing behavior. A quota-based sample of German voters (n = 330) consisting of 55 citizens whose voting intentions aligned with each of the country’s six main political parties responded to an online questionnaire consisting of multiple-choice and open-ended questions. Univariate descriptive statistical analyses of quantitative data were conducted, and multiple regressions were performed to determine log odds and significant variations among group-based responses. A pragmatic inductive coding process was used to conduct a thematic analysis of qualitative data. Results indicated that those participants who expressed an intention to vote for the populist radical right party were the least likely to follow health experts’ recommendations and the most likely to express anger and dissatisfaction over mask mandates. Prospective Left Party voters were the most likely to adhere to the advice of their doctors, while those associated with the Green Party were the most likely to adhere to the advice of public health experts. Most survey participants reported aligning their mask-wearing behavior with that of family and friends, with prospective CDU/CSU voters particularly likely to consider the mask-wearing behavior of family members. The results indicate that public health officials should consider how group-related factors influence public health compliance in order to encourage protective mask-wearing in the future.

Funder

Jaekel-Stiftung GmbH

Publisher

Public Library of Science (PLoS)

Reference50 articles.

1. Demokratievertrauen in Krisenzeiten: Wie blicken die Menschen in Deutschland auf Politik, Institutionen und Gesellschaft? Bonn: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung;V Best,2023

2. COVID-19 pandemic triggers 25% increase in prevalence of anxiety and depression worldwide;World Health Organization,2022

3. Mask use, risk-mitigation behaviours and pandemic fatigue during the COVID-19 pandemic in five cities in Australia, the UK and USA: A cross-sectional survey;CR MacIntyre;Int J Infect Dis,2021

4. Generalized self-efficacy and compliance with health behaviours related to COVID-19 in the US;EJ Hamerman;Psycho Health,2023

5. Effectiveness of Mask Wearing to Control Community Spread of SARS-CoV-2;JT Brooks;JAMA,2021

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3