Abstract
When combating a respiratory disease outbreak, the effectiveness of protective measures hinges on spontaneous shifts in human behavior driven by risk perception and careful cost-benefit analysis. In this study, a novel concept has been introduced, integrating social distancing and mask-wearing strategies into a unified framework that combines evolutionary game theory with an extended classical epidemic model. To yield deeper insights into human decision-making during COVID-19, we integrate both the prevalent dilemma faced at the epidemic’s onset regarding mask-wearing and social distancing practices, along with a comprehensive cost-benefit analysis. We explore the often-overlooked aspect of effective mask adoption among undetected infectious individuals to evaluate the significance of source control. Both undetected and detected infectious individuals can significantly reduce the risk of infection for non-masked individuals by wearing effective facemasks. When the economical burden of mask usage becomes unsustainable in the community, promoting affordable and safe social distancing becomes vital in slowing the epidemic’s progress, allowing crucial time for public health preparedness. In contrast, as the indirect expenses associated with safe social distancing escalate, affordable and effective facemask usage could be a feasible option. In our analysis, it was observed that during periods of heightened infection risk, there is a noticeable surge in public interest and dedication to complying with social distancing measures. However, its impact diminishes beyond a certain disease transmission threshold, as this strategy cannot completely eliminate the disease burden in the community. Maximum public compliance with social distancing and mask-wearing strategies can be achieved when they are affordable for the community. While implementing both strategies together could ultimately reduce the epidemic’s effective reproduction number (R e) to below one, countries still have the flexibility to prioritize either of them, easing strictness on the other based on their socio-economic conditions.
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Reference52 articles.
1. Emerging Pandemic Diseases: How We Got to COVID-19;DM Morens;Cell,2020
2. Global economic impacts of COVID-19 lockdown measures stand out in high-frequency shipping data;J Verschuur;PLOS ONE,2021
3. Covid-19: Experts debate merits of lockdowns versus “focused protection”;J Lenzer;BMJ,2020
4. An evidence review of face masks against COVID-19;J Howard;Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,2021
5. Effect of social distancing on COVID-19 incidence and mortality in the US;T VoPham;medRxiv,2020