Abstract
Devolution represented a concerted attempt to bring decision making closer to service delivery in Kenya, including within the health sector. This transformation created county governments with independent executive (responsible for implementing) and legislative (responsible for agenda-setting) arms. These new arrangements have undergone several growing pains that complicate management practices, such as planning and budgeting. Relatively little is known, however, about how these functions have evolved and varied sub-nationally. We conducted a problem-driven political economy analysis to better understand how these planning and budgeting processes are structured, enacted, and subject to change, in three counties. Key informant interviews (n = 32) were conducted with purposively selected participants in Garissa, Kisumu, and Turkana Counties; and national level in 2021, with participants drawn from a wide range of stakeholders involved in health sector planning and budgeting. We found that while devolution has greatly expanded participation in sub-national health management, it has also complicated and politicized decision-making. In this way, county governments now have the authority to allocate resources based on the preferences of their constituents, but at the expense of efficiency. Moreover, budgets are often not aligned with priority-setting processes and are frequently undermined by disbursements delays from national treasury, inconsistent supply chains, and administrative capacity constraints. In conclusion, while devolution has greatly transformed sub-national health management in Kenya with longer-term potential for greater accountability and health equity, short-to-medium term challenges persist in developing efficient systems for engaging a diverse array of stakeholders in planning and budgeting processes. Redressing management capacity challenges between and within counties is essential to ensure that the Kenya health system is responsive to local communities and aligned with the progressive aspirations of its universal health coverage movement.
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Reference39 articles.
1. Health sector reforms in Kenya: an examination of district level planning;CO Oyaya;Health Policy,2003
2. Odhiambo T. Read Kenyan memoirs to understand devolution story. Published 2013. Accessed April 21, 2022. https://hakipensheni.blogspot.com/2013/06/read-kenyan-memoirs-to-understand.html
3. Community and facility-level engagement in planning and budgeting for the government health sector—a district perspective from Kenya;WP O’Meara;Health Policy,2011
4. Health sector operational planning and budgeting processes in Kenya-"never the twain shall meet;B Tsofa;Int J Health Plann Manage,2016
5. Government of Kenya. Government Financial Management (Health Sector Services Fund) Regulations, 2007. http://kenyalaw.org/kl/index.php?id=649; 2007.
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Political economy analysis of health taxes (tobacco, alcohol drink and sugar-sweteened beverage): qualitative study of three provinces in Indonesia;BMJ Open;2024-08
2. Does innovative behaviour intervene between budgetary participation and performance in the public sector?;International Journal of Innovation Science;2024-07-23
3. Perspective Chapter: Improving Health Budgeting and Management Practices in Low Middle Income Countries (LMIC): Using 3 Country Case Studies—Nigeria, Kenya and Tanzania; Economics of Healthcare, Studies and Cases [Working Title];2024-05-24
4. Perceived progress toward scale of 14 maternal, newborn, child health, and nutrition (MNCHN) assets at subnational level in Burkina Faso, Ethiopia, India, Kenya, and Nigeria;PLOS Global Public Health;2024-03-15
5. Political Economy Analysis of Health Taxes (Tobacco, Alcohol Drink, and Sugar Sweteened Beverage): Case Study of Three Provinces in Indonesia;2024-02-01