Political economy analysis of sub-national health sector planning and budgeting: A case study of three counties in Kenya

Author:

Tsofa BenjaminORCID,Waweru Evelyn,Munywoki Joshua,Soe KhaingORCID,Rodriguez Daniela C.,Koon Adam D.ORCID

Abstract

Devolution represented a concerted attempt to bring decision making closer to service delivery in Kenya, including within the health sector. This transformation created county governments with independent executive (responsible for implementing) and legislative (responsible for agenda-setting) arms. These new arrangements have undergone several growing pains that complicate management practices, such as planning and budgeting. Relatively little is known, however, about how these functions have evolved and varied sub-nationally. We conducted a problem-driven political economy analysis to better understand how these planning and budgeting processes are structured, enacted, and subject to change, in three counties. Key informant interviews (n = 32) were conducted with purposively selected participants in Garissa, Kisumu, and Turkana Counties; and national level in 2021, with participants drawn from a wide range of stakeholders involved in health sector planning and budgeting. We found that while devolution has greatly expanded participation in sub-national health management, it has also complicated and politicized decision-making. In this way, county governments now have the authority to allocate resources based on the preferences of their constituents, but at the expense of efficiency. Moreover, budgets are often not aligned with priority-setting processes and are frequently undermined by disbursements delays from national treasury, inconsistent supply chains, and administrative capacity constraints. In conclusion, while devolution has greatly transformed sub-national health management in Kenya with longer-term potential for greater accountability and health equity, short-to-medium term challenges persist in developing efficient systems for engaging a diverse array of stakeholders in planning and budgeting processes. Redressing management capacity challenges between and within counties is essential to ensure that the Kenya health system is responsive to local communities and aligned with the progressive aspirations of its universal health coverage movement.

Funder

Wellcome Trust

UNICEF

Government of Kenya

Publisher

Public Library of Science (PLoS)

Reference39 articles.

1. Health sector reforms in Kenya: an examination of district level planning;CO Oyaya;Health Policy,2003

2. Odhiambo T. Read Kenyan memoirs to understand devolution story. Published 2013. Accessed April 21, 2022. https://hakipensheni.blogspot.com/2013/06/read-kenyan-memoirs-to-understand.html

3. Community and facility-level engagement in planning and budgeting for the government health sector—a district perspective from Kenya;WP O’Meara;Health Policy,2011

4. Health sector operational planning and budgeting processes in Kenya-"never the twain shall meet;B Tsofa;Int J Health Plann Manage,2016

5. Government of Kenya. Government Financial Management (Health Sector Services Fund) Regulations, 2007. http://kenyalaw.org/kl/index.php?id=649; 2007.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3