Vietnamese health professionals’ views on the status of the fetus and maternal and fetal health interests: A regional, cross-sectional study from the Hanoi area

Author:

Mogren Ingrid,Thi Lan Pham,Phuc Ho Dang,Holmlund SophiaORCID,Small Rhonda,Ntaganira Joseph,Sengoma Jean Paul Semasaka,Kidanto Hussein Lesio,Ngarina Matilda,Bergström CeciliaORCID

Abstract

Obstetric ultrasound is an important tool in managing pregnancies and its use is increasing globally. However, the status of the pregnant woman and the fetus may vary in terms of clinical management, views in the community and legislation. To investigate the views and experiences of Vietnamese health professionals on maternal and fetal health interests, priority setting and potential conflicts, we conducted a cross-sectional study using a structured questionnaire. Obstetricians/gynecologists, midwives and sonographers who manage pregnant women in maternity wards were invited to participate. We purposively chose public health facilities in the Hanoi region of Vietnam to obtain a representative sample. The final sample included 882 health professionals, of which 32.7% (n = 289) were obstetricians/gynecologists, 60.7% (n = 535) midwives and 6.6% (n = 58) sonographers. The majority of participants (60.3%) agreed that “The fetus is a person from the time of conception” and that maternal health interests should always be prioritised over fetal health interests in care provided (54.4%). 19.7% agreed that the fetus is never a patient, only the pregnant woman can be the patient, while 60.5% disagreed. Participants who performed ultrasounds were more likely to agree that fetal health interests are being given more weight in decision-making the further the gestation advances compared to those who did not perform ultrasounds (cOR 2.47, CI 1.27–4.79: n = 811). A significant proportion of health professionals in Vietnam assign the fetus the status of being a person, where personhood gradually evolves during pregnancy. While the fetus is often considered a patient with its own health interests, a majority of participants did give priority to maternal health interests. Health professionals appear to favour increased legal protection of the fetus. Strengthening the legal status of the fetus might have adverse implications for maternal autonomy. Measures to restrict maternal autonomy might require close observation to ensure that maternal reproductive rights are protected.

Funder

Umeå Universitet

Västerbotten Läns Landsting

Vetenskapsrådet

Forskningsrådet för Arbetsliv och Socialvetenskap

Publisher

Public Library of Science (PLoS)

Reference52 articles.

1. Obstetric ultrasound use in low and middle income countries: a narrative review;ET Kim;Reprod Health,2018

2. World Health Organization. WHO recommendations on antenatal care for a positive pregnancy experience. World Health Organization, Geneva. 2016. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241549912. Accessed 9 July 2024.

3. Ultrasound for fetal assessment in early pregnancy;M Whitworth;Cochrane database of systematic reviews (Online),2015

4. Ministry of Health Viet Nam and UNFPA. Viet Nam Midwifery Report 2016. Green One Un House, Hanoi. 2016. https://vietnam.unfpa.org/en/publications/viet-nam-midwifery-report. Accessed 9 July 2024.

5. Urban ‐ rural disparities in antenatal care utilization: a study of two cohorts of pregnant women in Vietnam;TK Tran;BMC Health Serv Res,2011

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3