Author:
Tugwell Peter,Boers Maarten,D’Agostino Maria-Antonietta,Beaton Dorcas,Boonen Annelies,Bingham Clifton O.,Choy Ernest,Conaghan Philip G.,Dougados Maxime,Duarte Catia,Furst Daniel E.,Guillemin Francis,Gossec Laure,Heiberg Turid,van der Heijde Désirée M.,Hewlett Sarah,Kirwan John R.,Kvien Tore K.,Landewé Robert B.,Mease Philip J.,Østergaard Mikkel,Simon Lee,Singh Jasvinder A.,Strand Vibeke,Wells George
Abstract
Objective.The Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) Filter provides guidelines for the development and validation of outcome measures for use in clinical research. The “Truth” section of the OMERACT Filter requires that criteria be met to demonstrate that the outcome instrument meets the criteria for content, face, and construct validity.Methods.Discussion groups critically reviewed a variety of ways in which case studies of current OMERACT Working Groups complied with the Truth component of the Filter and what issues remained to be resolved.Results.The case studies showed that there is broad agreement on criteria for meeting the Truth criteria through demonstration of content, face, and construct validity; however, several issues were identified that the Filter Working Group will need to address.Conclusion.These issues will require resolution to reach consensus on how Truth will be assessed for the proposed Filter 2.0 framework, for instruments to be endorsed by OMERACT.
Publisher
The Journal of Rheumatology
Subject
Immunology,Immunology and Allergy,Rheumatology
Cited by
34 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献