Clinical Inertia in Terms of Recurrent Hospitalization in the Treatment of Heart Failure Between General Physicians and Cardiologists

Author:

Shaikh Kaleem Ullah,Sarfaraz Abeer,Sarfaraz Sana,Anwar Muhammad Wasiq,Salari Falaknaz,Fatima Faryal

Abstract

Cardiologists are more likely to use clinical guideline-supported therapies than general physicians, a fact that has been shown to reduce readmissions. Objective: To compare the intensification of heart failure treatment and its course with re-hospitalization among general physicians and cardiologists at a tertiary care hospital. Methodology: An observational cross-sectional study was conducted in the cardiology inpatient department of a tertiary care hospital from June 2023 to December 2023 for six months. All patients admitted with acute decompensated heart failure with reduced ejection fraction were included. The treatment prescriptions that they had been followed before the event were noted along with the fact that whether they were treated by a cardiologist or a general physician, and their compliance with medical treatment was recorded. Frequencies and percentages were computed for qualitative variables. Results: A statistically significant association of re-admission was observed among cardiologists (1.40 ± 0.57) compared to general physicians (2.54 ± 0.57; p<0.001). Almost 100% of cardiologists advised beta blockers as compared to their prescription by 42% of general physicians. All cardiologists advised ARBS/ACE inhibitors as compared to 58% of general physicians. 90% of cardiologists advised aldosterone receptor antagonists as compared to 10% of general physicians. Only 12% of cardiologists advised SGLT-2 inhibitors as compared to 88% of physicians. Overall, 36% of cardiologists recommended guideline-mediated therapy while 12% of general physicians recommended guideline-mediated therapy. Conclusions: Cardiologist care is significantly associated with reduced re-admissions among patients re-admitted after heart failure treatment. 

Publisher

CrossLinks International Publishers

Subject

General Engineering

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3