Comparison of Genetic Profiles of Neonates in Intensive Care Units Conceived With or Without Assisted Reproductive Technology

Author:

Huang Zhongwen1,Xiao Feifan1,Xiao Hui1,Lu Yulan1,Yang Lin2,Zhuang Deyi3,Chen Liping4,Wei Qiufen5,Jiang Yinmo1,Li Gang1,Wu Bingbing1,Liu Zhiwei6,Zhou Wenhao17,Wang Huijun1

Affiliation:

1. Center for Molecular Medicine, Children’s Hospital of Fudan University, National Children’s Medical Center, Shanghai, China

2. Department of Endocrinology and Inherited Metabolic Diseases, Children’s Hospital of Fudan University, National Children’s Medical Center, Shanghai, China

3. Department of Neonatology, Xiamen Children’s Hospital, Xiamen, Fujian, China

4. Department of Neonatology, Jiangxi Provincial Children’s Hospital, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China

5. Department of Neonatology, Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Nanning, Guangxi, China

6. Department of Neonatology, International Peace Maternity and Children Hospital of China Welfare Institution, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China

7. Department of Neonatology, Children’s Hospital of Fudan University, National Children’s Medical Center, Key Laboratory of Neonatal Diseases, Ministry of Health, Shanghai, China

Abstract

ImportanceA growing number of children are conceived with assisted reproductive technology (ART). However, there is a lack of studies systematically analyzing the genetic landscape of live-born children conceived through ART who need intensive care in the neonatal period.ObjectiveTo investigate the incidence and type of molecular defects among neonates conceived through ART who are in intensive care units (NICUs) with suspected genetic conditions.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis was a cross-sectional study using data from the China Neonatal Genomes Project, a multicenter national neonatal genome data set managed by the Children’s Hospital of Fudan University. All participants were from level III and IV NICUs and included 535 neonates conceived through ART with suspected genetic conditions, with data collected between August 1, 2016, and December 31, 2021, and 1316 naturally conceived neonates with suspected genetic conditions in the same clinical settings, with data collected between August 1, 2016, and December 31, 2018. The data were analyzed between September 2021 and January 2023.ExposuresWhole-exome sequencing or target clinical exome sequencing with pathogenic or likely pathogenic single-nucleotide variant (SNV) and copy number variation (CNV) detection was performed for each individual.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary outcome was the molecular diagnostic yield, mode of inheritance, spectrum of genetic events, and incidence of de novo variants.ResultsA total of 535 neonates conceived through ART (319 boys [59.6%]) and 1316 naturally conceived neonates (772 boys [58.7%]) were included. A genetic diagnosis was established for 54 patients conceived through ART (10.1%), including 34 patients with SNVs (63.0%) and 20 with CNVs (37.0%). In the non-ART group, 174 patients (13.2%) received a genetic diagnosis, including 120 patients with SNVs (69.0%) and 54 with CNVs (31.0%). The overall diagnostic yield was comparable between the ART group and the naturally conceived neonates (10.1% vs 13.2%; odds ratio [OR], 0.74; 95% CI, 0.53-1.02), as was the proportion of SNVs (63.0% vs 69.0%; OR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.46-1.00) and CNVs (37.0% vs 31.0%; OR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.54-1.53) detected by sequencing. Furthermore, the proportions of de novo variants in the ART group and the non-ART group were similar (75.9% [41 of 54] vs 64.4% [112 of 174]; OR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.62-1.30).Conclusions and RelevanceThis cross-sectional study of neonates in NICUs suggests that the overall genetic diagnostic yield and the incidence of de novo variants were similar between live-born neonates conceived through ART and naturally conceived neonates in the same settings.

Publisher

American Medical Association (AMA)

Subject

General Medicine

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3