Control Groups in RCTs Supporting Approval of Drugs for Systemic Rheumatic Diseases, 2012-2022

Author:

Liu Yang12,Xie Yan3,Qin Yunhe4,Xie Qibing3,Chen Xiaoyuan12

Affiliation:

1. Tsinghua Clinical Research Institute, School of Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China

2. Office of Clinical Trial Institute, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, Beijing, China

3. Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China

4. Pharmcube (Beijing) Co, Ltd, Beijing, China

Abstract

ImportanceRandomized clinical trials (RCTs) testing innovative drugs must strive to use optimal control groups to reflect the best available treatments. A comprehensive evaluation of the quality of control groups in pivotal RCTs supporting systemic rheumatic disease (SRD) drug approvals by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is lacking.ObjectiveTo examine the proportion of pivotal RCTs that used optimal control groups among RCTs supporting newly approved SRD drugs in the US over the past decade.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsIn this study, individual RCTs supporting SRD new drug approvals by the FDA between January 2012 and October 2022 were analyzed for design, study duration, control group, and primary end point. The quality of control groups was determined by comparison with published guidelines before and during the trial.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary measure was the proportion of RCTs using optimal control groups. Differences in response rate between investigating and control groups and the response rate of placebo control groups were also examined.ResultsBetween January 2012 and October 2022, the FDA approved 44 SRD drugs, involving 65 pivotal RCTs. Overall, 16 RCTs used optimal control groups. In 55 trials, no active groups were used, and more than 80% of these trials were suboptimal (47 trials [85.5%]). Among 56 trials for systemic arthritis, 49 trials used suboptimal control groups, mainly placebo or dose-response controls (47 trials), with a few active controls (2 trials). Studies of other SRDs frequently used placebo or dose-response controls but were considered optimal controls (8 trials). There was significant improvement in response rates of investigating compared with placebo groups, with relative risk mostly exceeding 1.50 (range, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.69-1.17 for anifrolumab to 11.00; 95% CI, 2.69-44.96 for mepolizumab). In all placebo-controlled trials, the median (IQR) response rate in placebo groups was 26.0% (19.2%-32.3%).Conclusions and RelevanceThese findings suggest that the quality of control groups in RCTs leading to SRD drug approval needs improvement and that despite challenges in translating scientific theories to clinical scenarios, it is crucial to consistently prioritize efforts to promote appropriate control group selection to ensure the accurate assessment of innovative drug efficacy.

Publisher

American Medical Association (AMA)

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3