Efficacy and Safety of Mifepristone in the Treatment of Male US Veterans With Posttraumatic Stress Disorder

Author:

Golier Julia A.12,Li Xue3,Bizien Marcel4,Hurley Robin A.56,Bechard Brendan W.12,Kimbrell Timothy7,Flory Janine D.12,Baker Dewleen G.8,Yehuda Rachel12,Reda Domenic J.3

Affiliation:

1. Veterans Affairs (VA) Medical Center, Bronx, New York

2. Department of Psychiatry, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York

3. VA Cooperative Studies Program, Hines, Illinois

4. VA Cooperative Studies Program Clinical Research Coordinating Center, Albuquerque, New Mexico

5. VA Medical Center, Salisbury, North Carolina

6. Department of Psychiatry and Radiology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina

7. Central Arkansas VA Healthcare, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville

8. VA San Diego Healthcare System, University of California, San Diego, San Diego

Abstract

ImportanceTo date, no psychopharmacologic treatment has been found to be uniformly effective in veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD); novel targets and approaches are needed to treat this disabling disorder.ObjectiveTo examine whether treatment with the glucocorticoid receptor antagonist mifepristone yields a signal for clinical efficacy in male veterans with PTSD.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis phase 2a, double-blind, parallel-group randomized clinical trial was conducted from November 19, 2012 (accrual started), through November 16, 2016 (final follow-up), within the US Department of Veterans Affairs. Participants were male veterans with chronic PTSD and a screening Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale score of 50 or higher. A total of 181 veterans consented to participation. Statistical analysis was conducted between August 2014 and May 2017.InterventionsParticipants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to mifepristone (600 mg) or matched placebo taken orally for 7 days.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe clinical outcome was whether a veteran achieved a clinical response status (a reduction of ≥30% of total Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale score from baseline) at 4- and 12-week follow-up. On the basis of a binary statistical selection rule, a difference in the proportion of treatment vs control group responders of 15% would be a clinically relevant difference. Self-report measures of PTSD and associated symptoms were also obtained. Neuroendocrine outcomes and plasma levels of mifepristone were measured. Safety was assessed throughout the study. The primary analysis was based on a multiple imputation technique to address missing outcome data; thus, some participant numbers may not appear as whole numbers.ResultsA total of 81 veterans were enrolled and randomized. Excluding 1 participant randomized in error, 80 were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis (41 randomized to mifepristone and 39 to placebo). The mean (SD) age was 43.1 (13.7) years. A total of 15.6 (38.1%) in the mifepristone group and 12.1 (31.1%) in the placebo group were clinical responders at 4 weeks in the analysis using the multiple imputation technique. The group difference in the proportion of clinical responders (7.0%) was less than the predefined margin of 15% indicating signal for clinical efficacy. In an exploratory analysis, the difference in response to mifepristone vs placebo in the subgroup with no lifetime history of traumatic brain injury (TBI) (7.0 [50.0%] vs 3.0 [27.3%]; difference, 22.7%) exceeded the efficacy margin at 4 weeks and was sustained at 12 weeks. In contrast, in veterans with PTSD and lifetime TBI, the response rate to mifepristone was lower than placebo at 12 weeks (7.4 [27.4%] vs 13.5 [48.3%]; difference, −20.9%).Conclusions and RelevanceThis study did not detect a signal for efficacy for mifepristone at 600 mg/d for 1 week in male veterans with chronic PTSD. Thus, this study does not support a phase 3 trial in this population. Future studies of mifepristone for the treatment of PTSD may be of interest in those without a history of TBI or in samples with a low base rate of lifetime head trauma.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01946685

Publisher

American Medical Association (AMA)

Subject

General Medicine

Reference37 articles.

1. Trends in medication prescribing in patients with PTSD from 2009 to 2018: a national Veterans Administration study.;Holder;J Clin Psychiatry,2021

2. Lack of efficacy for fluoxetine in PTSD: a placebo controlled trial in combat veterans.;Hertzberg;Ann Clin Psychiatry,2000

3. Double-blind placebo-controlled pilot study of sertraline in military veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder.;Zohar;J Clin Psychopharmacol,2002

4. Trial of prazosin for post-traumatic stress disorder in military veterans.;Raskind;N Engl J Med,2018

5. How do glucocorticoids influence stress responses? integrating permissive, suppressive, stimulatory, and preparative actions.;Sapolsky;Endocr Rev,2000

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3