Goals of Care Among Parents of Children Receiving Palliative Care
-
Published:2023-08-01
Issue:8
Volume:177
Page:800
-
ISSN:2168-6203
-
Container-title:JAMA Pediatrics
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:JAMA Pediatr
Author:
Feudtner Chris12, Beight Leah J.3, Boyden Jackelyn Y.14, Hill Douglas L.1, Hinds Pamela S.5, Johnston Emily E.6, Friebert Sarah E.7, Bogetz Jori F.8, Kang Tammy I.9, Hall Matt10, Nye Russell T.1, Wolfe Joanne11, Arevalo-Soriano Tatiana12, Bilodeau Madeline12, Catrine Kris12, Chapman Jennifer12, Crew Karen12, Das Porag Jeet12, Friebert Sarah12, Griffis Heather12, Hays Ross12, Helton Gabby12, Jenkins Rachel12, Katkoff Hannah12, Kostoff Ali12, Maglionico Deborah12, Martinez Isaac12, Mercer Amanda12, Morris Ashley12, Nelpati Shimel12, Porth Rachel12, Sherr Nicole E.12, Shipman Kelly12, Xiao Rui12, Walla Namrata12,
Affiliation:
1. Justin Ingerman Center for Palliative Care, The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 2. Department of Pediatrics, Medical Ethics and Health Policy, The Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia 3. Doctor of Medicine Program, Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC 4. Department of Family and Community Health, School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia 5. Children’s National Hospital, Department of Nursing Science, Professional Practice & Quality, Department of Pediatrics, the George Washington University, Washington, DC 6. Department of Pediatrics, Division of Hematology and Oncology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham 7. Department of Pediatrics, Division of Palliative Care, Akron Children’s Hospital and Rebecca D. Considine Research Institute, Akron, Ohio 8. Department of Pediatrics, Division of Bioethics and Palliative Care, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle 9. Department of Pediatrics, Section of Palliative Care, Texas Children’s Hospital and Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 10. Children’s Hospital Association, Lenexa, Kansas 11. Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana Farber Cancer Institute and Department of Pediatrics Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 12. for the PPCRN SHARE Project Group
Abstract
ImportanceWhile knowing the goals of care (GOCs) for children receiving pediatric palliative care (PPC) are crucial for guiding the care they receive, how parents prioritize these goals and how their priorities may change over time is not known.ObjectiveTo determine parental prioritization of GOCs and patterns of change over time for parents of children receiving palliative care.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsA Pediatric Palliative Care Research Network’s Shared Data and Research cohort study with data collected at 0, 2, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months in hospital, outpatient, or home settings from April 10, 2017, to February 15, 2022, at 7 PPC programs based at children’s hospitals across the US. Participants included parents of patients, birth to 30 years of age, who received PPC services.ExposuresAnalyses were adjusted for demographic characteristics, number of complex chronic conditions, and time enrolled in PPC.Main OutcomesParents’ importance scores, as measured using a discrete choice experiment, of 5 preselected GOCs: seeking quality of life (QOL), health, comfort, disease modification, or life extension. Importance scores for the 5 GOCs summed to 100.ResultsA total of 680 parents of 603 patients reported on GOCs. Median patient age was 4.4 (IQR, 0.8-13.2) years and 320 patients were male (53.1%). At baseline, parents scored QOL as the most important goal (mean score, 31.5 [SD, 8.4]), followed by health (26.3 [SD, 7.5]), comfort (22.4 [SD, 11.7]), disease modification (10.9 [SD, 9.2]), and life extension (8.9 [SD, 9.9]). Importantly, parents varied substantially in their baseline scores for each goal (IQRs more than 9.4), but across patients in different complex chronic conditions categories, the mean scores varied only slightly (means differ 8.7 or less). For each additional study month since PPC initiation, QOL was scored higher by 0.06 (95% CI, 0.04-0.08) and comfort scored higher by 0.3 (95% CI, 0-0.06), while the importance score for life extension decreased by 0.07 (95% CI, 0.04-0.09) and disease modification by 0.02 (95% CI, 0-0.04); health scores did not significantly differ from PPC initiation.Conclusions and RelevanceParents of children receiving PPC placed the highest value on QOL, but with considerable individual-level variation and substantial change over time. These findings emphasize the importance of reassessing GOCs with parents to guide appropriate clinical intervention.
Publisher
American Medical Association (AMA)
Subject
Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
Cited by
8 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|