Efficacy of Continuous Transdermal Nitroglycerin for Treating Hot Flashes by Inducing Nitrate Cross-tolerance in Perimenopausal and Postmenopausal Women

Author:

Huang Alison J.1,Cummings Steven R.12,Ganz Peter1,Schembri Michael3,Raghunathan Harini1,Vittinghoff Eric4,Gibson Carolyn J.56,Grady Deborah17

Affiliation:

1. Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco

2. San Francisco Coordinating Center, California Pacific Medical Center Research Institute, San Francisco

3. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of California, San Francisco

4. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco

5. San Francisco VA Health Care System, San Francisco, California

6. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco

7. Deputy Editor, JAMA Internal Medicine

Abstract

ImportanceDue to the potential risks of long-term systemic estrogen therapy, many menopausal women are interested in nonhormonal treatments for vasomotor symptoms. Physiologic studies indicate that nitric oxide plays a key role in mediating hot flash–related vasodilation, suggesting that nonhormonal medications that induce nitrate tolerance in the vasculature may offer therapeutic benefit for vasomotor symptoms.ObjectiveTo determine whether uninterrupted administration of transdermal nitroglycerin (NTG) to induce nitrate cross-tolerance decreased the frequency or severity of menopause-related hot flashes.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trial included perimenopausal or postmenopausal women reporting 7 or more hot flashes per day who were recruited from northern California by study personnel at a single academic center. Patients were randomized between July 2017 and December 2021, and the trial ended in April 2022 when the last randomized participant completed follow-up.InterventionsUninterrupted daily use of transdermal NTG (participant-directed dose titration from 0.2-0.6 mg/h) or identical placebo patches.Main Outcome MeasuresValidated symptom diaries assessing changes in any hot flash frequency (primary outcome) and moderate-to-severe hot flash frequency over 5 and 12 weeks.ResultsAmong the 141 randomized participants (70 NTG [49.6%], 71 placebo [50.4%]; 12 [85.8%] Asian, 16 [11.3%] Black or African American, 15 [10.6%] Hispanic or Latina, 3 [2.1%] multiracial, 1 [0.7%] Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander, and 100 [70.9%] White or Caucasian individuals), a mean (SD) of 10.8 (3.5) hot flashes and 8.4 (3.6) moderate-to-severe hot flashes daily was reported at baseline. Sixty-five participants assigned to NTG (92.9%) and 69 assigned to placebo (97.2%) completed 12-week follow-up (P = .27). Over 5 weeks, the estimated change in any hot flash frequency associated with NTG vs placebo was −0.9 (95% CI, −2.1 to 0.3) episodes per day (P = .10), and change in moderate-to-severe hot flash frequency with NTG vs placebo was −1.1 (95% CI, −2.2 to 0) episodes per day (P = .05). At 12 weeks, treatment with NTG did not significantly decrease the frequency of any hot flashes (−0.1 episodes per day; 95% CI, −1.2 to 0.4) or moderate-to-severe hot flashes (−0.5 episodes per day; 95% CI, −1.6 to 0.7) relative to placebo. In analyses combining 5-week and 12-week data, no significant differences in change in the frequency of any hot flashes (−0.5 episodes per day; 95% CI, −1.6 to 0.6; P = .25) or moderate-to-severe hot flashes (−0.8 episodes per day; 95% CI, −1.9 to 0.2; P = .12) were detected with NTG vs placebo. At 1 week, 47 NTG (67.1%) and 4 placebo participants (5.6%) reported headache (P < .001), but only 1 participant in each group reported headache at 12 weeks.Conclusions and RelevanceThis randomized clinical trial found that continuous use of NTG did not result in sustained improvements in hot flash frequency or severity relative to placebo and was associated with more early but not persistent headache.Trial RegistrationClinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02714205

Publisher

American Medical Association (AMA)

Subject

Internal Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3