Affiliation:
1. Division of Dermatology, Dell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin
2. Institute of Marine Science, University of California, Santa Cruz
3. Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
Abstract
ImportanceAlthough UV radiation exposure is the conventionally reported risk factor for cutaneous melanoma, an alternative exposure is diagnostic scrutiny: the more physicians look for and biopsy moles, the more melanoma they find.ObjectiveTo assess the association of proxies for UV radiation exposure and diagnostic scrutiny with geographical patterns of melanoma incidence.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis was a cross-sectional ecological analysis of the 727 continental US counties reporting to the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program (among a total of 3108 counties). Environmental data relevant to UV radiation exposure (from a variety of sources), Health Resources and Services Administration data relevant to diagnostic scrutiny, and SEER data on melanoma incidence among the non-Hispanic White population diagnosed with melanoma from 2012 through 2016 were combined. Data analysis was performed between January 2020 and July 2022.ExposuresThree UV radiation proxies (UV daily dose, cloud variability, and temperature variability) and 3 diagnostic scrutiny proxies (median household income, dermatologists, and primary care physician supply).Main Outcomes and MeasuresMelanoma incidence (in situ and invasive cancers).ResultsIn total, 235 333 melanomas were diagnosed. Proxies for UV radiation exposure changed gradually across geography, while melanoma incidence and proxies for diagnostic scrutiny changed abruptly across contiguous counties. The UV daily dose, a variable the National Cancer Institute specifically developed for melanoma analyses, was uncorrelated with incidence (r = 0.03; P = .42). For context, smoking prevalence was highly correlated with lung cancer incidence in the same counties (r = 0.81; P < .001). Melanoma incidence was correlated with median household income (r = 0.43; P < .001). Counties with no dermatologists and shortages of primary care physicians had the lowest incidence, while counties amply supplied with both had the highest, despite having lower mean UV daily dose. There was little association between melanoma incidence and melanoma mortality (r = 0.09; P = .05), while the analogous association in lung cancer was strong (r = 0.96; P < .001).Conclusions and RelevanceIn this cross-sectional ecological study, the current geographical pattern of melanoma incidence across US counties was less associated with proxies for UV radiation exposure and more so with proxies for diagnostic scrutiny. Incidence—the fundamental epidemiologic measure of disease frequency—now had little association with the feared outcome of melanoma: death.
Publisher
American Medical Association (AMA)
Reference29 articles.
1. Incidence of and treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast.;Ernster;JAMA,1996
2. Rethinking screening for breast cancer and prostate cancer.;Esserman;JAMA,2009
3. Declining incidence rates of prostate cancer in the United States: is this good news or not?;Downer;JAMA Oncol,2017
4. Korea’s thyroid-cancer “epidemic”–screening and overdiagnosis.;Ahn;N Engl J Med,2014
5. Malignant melanoma in the 21st century, part 1: epidemiology, risk factors, screening, prevention, and diagnosis.;Markovic;Mayo Clin Proc,2007
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献