Diagnostic Accuracy of an Integrated AI Tool to Estimate Gestational Age From Blind Ultrasound Sweeps

Author:

Stringer Jeffrey S. A.1,Pokaprakarn Teeranan2,Prieto Juan C.3,Vwalika Bellington4,Chari Srihari V.1,Sindano Ntazana5,Freeman Bethany L.1,Sikapande Bridget5,Davis Nicole M.1,Sebastião Yuri V.1,Mandona Nelly M.5,Stringer Elizabeth M.1,Benabdelkader Chiraz1,Mungole Mutinta5,Kapilya Filson M.5,Almnini Nariman1,Diaz Arieska N.1,Fecteau Brittany A.1,Kosorok Michael R.2,Cole Stephen R.6,Kasaro Margaret P.4

Affiliation:

1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill

2. Department of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill

3. Department of Psychiatry, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill

4. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Zambia School of Medicine, Lusaka, Zambia

5. UNC Global Project-Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia

6. Department of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill

Abstract

ImportanceAccurate assessment of gestational age (GA) is essential to good pregnancy care but often requires ultrasonography, which may not be available in low-resource settings. This study developed a deep learning artificial intelligence (AI) model to estimate GA from blind ultrasonography sweeps and incorporated it into the software of a low-cost, battery-powered device.ObjectiveTo evaluate GA estimation accuracy of an AI-enabled ultrasonography tool when used by novice users with no prior training in sonography.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis prospective diagnostic accuracy study enrolled 400 individuals with viable, single, nonanomalous, first-trimester pregnancies in Lusaka, Zambia, and Chapel Hill, North Carolina. Credentialed sonographers established the “ground truth” GA via transvaginal crown-rump length measurement. At random follow-up visits throughout gestation, including a primary evaluation window from 14 0/7 weeks’ to 27 6/7 weeks’ gestation, novice users obtained blind sweeps of the maternal abdomen using the AI-enabled device (index test) and credentialed sonographers performed fetal biometry with a high-specification machine (study standard).Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary outcome was the mean absolute error (MAE) of the index test and study standard, which was calculated by comparing each method’s estimate to the previously established GA and considered equivalent if the difference fell within a prespecified margin of ±2 days.ResultsIn the primary evaluation window, the AI-enabled device met criteria for equivalence to the study standard, with an MAE (SE) of 3.2 (0.1) days vs 3.0 (0.1) days (difference, 0.2 days [95% CI, −0.1 to 0.5]). Additionally, the percentage of assessments within 7 days of the ground truth GA was comparable (90.7% for the index test vs 92.5% for the study standard). Performance was consistent in prespecified subgroups, including the Zambia and North Carolina cohorts and those with high body mass index.Conclusions and RelevanceBetween 14 and 27 weeks’ gestation, novice users with no prior training in ultrasonography estimated GA as accurately with the low-cost, point-of-care AI tool as credentialed sonographers performing standard biometry on high-specification machines. These findings have immediate implications for obstetrical care in low-resource settings, advancing the World Health Organization goal of ultrasonography estimation of GA for all pregnant people.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05433519

Publisher

American Medical Association (AMA)

Reference23 articles.

1. Practice Bulletin No. 175: ultrasound in pregnancy.;Committee on Practice Bulletins—Obstetrics and the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine;Obstet Gynecol,2016

2. Estimating fetal age: computer-assisted analysis of multiple fetal growth parameters.;Hadlock;Radiology,1984

3. Ultrasound-based gestational-age estimation in late pregnancy.;Papageorghiou;Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol,2016

4. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 741: maternal immunization.;American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists;Obstet Gynecol,2018

5. Updated WHO recommendations on antenatal corticosteroids and tocolytic therapy for improving preterm birth outcomes.;Vogel;Lancet Glob Health,2022

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3