Harmonizing Definitions for Progression Independent of Relapse Activity in Multiple Sclerosis

Author:

Müller Jannis123,Cagol Alessandro12,Lorscheider Johannes13,Tsagkas Charidimos123,Benkert Pascal4,Yaldizli Özgür123,Kuhle Jens13,Derfuss Tobias13,Sormani Maria Pia56,Thompson Alan78,Granziera Cristina123,Kappos Ludwig12

Affiliation:

1. Research Center for Clinical Neuroimmunology and Neuroscience Basel (RC2NB), University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland

2. Translational Imaging in Neurology (ThINk) Basel, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland

3. Neurologic Clinic and Policlinic, Department of Neurology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland

4. Department of Clinical Research, Clinical Trial Unit, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland

5. Department of Health Sciences, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy

6. IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy

7. Queen Square MS Centre, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, United Kingdom

8. NIHR University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, London, United Kingdom

Abstract

ImportanceEmerging evidence suggests that progression independent of relapse activity (PIRA) is a substantial contributor to long-term disability accumulation in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). To date, there is no uniform agreed-upon definition of PIRA, limiting the comparability of published studies.ObjectiveTo summarize the current evidence about PIRA based on a systematic review, to discuss the various terminologies used in the context of PIRA, and to propose a harmonized definition for PIRA for use in clinical practice and future trials.Evidence ReviewA literature search was conducted using the search terms multiple sclerosis, PIRA, progression independent of relapse activity, silent progression, and progression unrelated to relapses in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science, published between January 1990 and December 2022.FindingsOf 119 identified single records, 48 eligible studies were analyzed. PIRA was reported to occur in roughly 5% of all patients with RRMS per annum, causing at least 50% of all disability accrual events in typical RRMS. The proportion of PIRA vs relapse-associated worsening increased with age, longer disease duration, and, despite lower absolute event numbers, potent suppression of relapses by highly effective disease-modifying therapy. However, different studies used various definitions of PIRA, rendering the comparability of studies difficult.Conclusion and RelevancePIRA is the most frequent manifestation of disability accumulation across the full spectrum of traditional MS phenotypes, including clinically isolated syndrome and early RRMS. The harmonized definition suggested here may improve the comparability of results in current and future cohorts and data sets.

Publisher

American Medical Association (AMA)

Subject

Neurology (clinical)

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3