Treatment of Refractory Status Epilepticus With Continuous Intravenous Anesthetic Drugs

Author:

Au Yu Kan12,Kananeh Mohammed F.34,Rahangdale Rahul5,Moore Timothy Eoin6,Panza Gregory A.7,Gaspard Nicolas89,Hirsch Lawrence J.8,Fernandez Andres10,Shah Syed Omar10

Affiliation:

1. Department of Neurosciences, Hartford Hospital, University of Connecticut, Hartford, Connecticut

2. Department of Neurology, University of Connecticut, Farmington

3. Department of Neurology, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, New Jersey

4. Department of Neurology, Hackensack Meridian School of Medicine, Hackensack, New Jersey

5. Neuroscience Institute, Ascension St John Medical Center, Tulsa, Oklahoma

6. Statistical Consulting Services, Center for Open Research Resources & Equipment, University of Connecticut, Storrs

7. Department of Research, Hartford HealthCare, Hartford, Connecticut

8. Department of Neurology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut

9. Université Libre de Bruxelles and Service de Neurologie, Hôpital Universitaire de Bruxelles - Hôpital Erasme, Brussels, Belgium

10. Department of Neurology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Abstract

ImportanceMultiple continuous intravenous anesthetic drugs (CIVADs) are available for the treatment of refractory status epilepticus (RSE). There is a paucity of data comparing the different types of CIVADs used for RSE.ObjectiveTo systematically review and compare outcome measures associated with the initial CIVAD choice in RSE in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.Evidence ReviewData sources included English and non-English articles using Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed, and Web of Science (January 1994-June 2023) as well as manual search. Study selection included peer-reviewed studies of 5 or more patients and at least 1 patient older than 12 years with status epilepticus refractory to a benzodiazepine and at least 1 standard antiseizure medication, treated with continuously infused midazolam, ketamine, propofol, pentobarbital, or thiopental. Independent extraction of articles was performed using prespecified data items. The association between outcome variables and CIVAD was examined with an analysis of variance or χ2 test where appropriate. Binary logistic regressions were used to examine the association between outcome variables and CIVAD with etiology, change in mortality over time, electroencephalography (EEG) monitoring (continuous vs intermittent), and treatment goal (seizure vs burst suppression) included as covariates. Risk of bias was addressed by listing the population and type of each study.FindingsA total of 66 studies with 1637 patients were included. Significant differences among CIVAD groups in short-term failure, hypotension, and CIVAD substitution during treatment were observed. Non–epilepsy-related RSE (vs epilepsy-related RSE) was associated with a higher rate of CIVAD substitution (60 of 120 [50.0%] vs 11 of 43 [25.6%]; odds ratio [OR], 3.11; 95% CI, 1.44-7.11; P = .006) and mortality (98 of 227 [43.2%] vs 7 of 63 [11.1%]; OR, 17.0; 95% CI, 4.71-109.35; P < .001). Seizure suppression was associated with mortality (OR, 7.72; 95% CI, 1.77-39.23; P = .005), but only a small subgroup was available for analysis (seizure suppression: 17 of 22 [77.3%] from 3 publications vs burst suppression: 25 of 98 [25.5%] from 12 publications). CIVAD choice and EEG type were not predictors of mortality. Earlier publication year was associated with mortality, although the observation was no longer statistically significant after adjusting SEs for clustering.Conclusions and RelevanceEpilepsy-related RSE was associated with lower mortality compared with other RSE etiologies. A trend of decreasing mortality over time was observed, which may suggest an effect of advances in neurocritical care. The overall data are heterogeneous, which limits definitive conclusions on the choice of optimal initial CIVAD in RSE treatment.

Publisher

American Medical Association (AMA)

Reference69 articles.

1. Guidelines for the evaluation and management of status epilepticus.;Brophy;Neurocrit Care,2012

2. Treatment of refractory status epilepticus with pentobarbital, propofol, or midazolam: a systematic review.;Claassen;Epilepsia,2002

3. A randomized trial for the treatment of refractory status epilepticus.;Rossetti;Neurocrit Care,2011

4. The efficacy of propofol and midazolam in treatment of refractory status epilepticus in children.;Mahvelati;Iran J Med Sci,2007

5. A comparative study of midazolam and target-controlled propofol infusion in the treatment of refractory status epilepticus.;Masapu;Indian J Crit Care Med,2018

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3