Ghrelin for Neuroprotection in Post–Cardiac Arrest Coma

Author:

Nutma Sjoukje12,Beishuizen Albertus3,van den Bergh Walter M.4,Foudraine Norbert A.5,le Feber Joost1,Filius P. Margreet G.6,Cornet Alexander D.3,van der Palen Job78,van Putten Michel J. A. M.12,Hofmeijer Jeannette19, ,Vermeijden J. Wytze10

Affiliation:

1. Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Technical Medical Center, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands

2. Department of Neurology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands

3. Department of Critical Care, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands

4. Department of Critical Care, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands

5. Department of Critical Care, VieCuri Medical Center, Venlo, the Netherlands

6. Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, the Netherlands

7. Department of Epidemiology, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands

8. Section of Cognition, Data and Education, Faculty of Behavioral, Management and Social Sciences, University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands

9. Department of Neurology, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, the Netherlands

10. for the GRECO Investigators

Abstract

ImportanceOut-of-hospital cardiac arrest survival rates have markedly risen in the last decades, but neurological outcome only improved marginally. Despite research on more than 20 neuroprotective strategies involving patients in comas after cardiac arrest, none have demonstrated unequivocal evidence of efficacy; however, treatment with acyl-ghrelin has shown improved functional and histological brain recovery in experimental models of cardiac arrest and was safe in a wide variety of human study populations.ObjectiveTo determine safety and potential efficacy of intravenous acyl-ghrelin to improve neurological outcome in patients in a coma after cardiac arrest.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsA phase 2, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, randomized clinical trial, Ghrelin Treatment of Comatose Patients After Cardiac Arrest: A Clinical Trial to Promote Cerebral Recovery (GRECO), was conducted between January 18, 2019, and October 17, 2022. Adult patients 18 years or older who were in a comatose state after cardiac arrest were assessed for eligibility; patients were from 3 intensive care units in the Netherlands. Expected death within 48 hours or unfeasibility of treatment initiation within 12 hours were exclusion criteria.InterventionsPatients were randomized to receive intravenous acyl-ghrelin, 600 μg (intervention group), or placebo (control group) within 12 hours after cardiac arrest, continued for 7 days, twice daily, in addition to standard care.Main Outcomes and MeasuresPrimary outcome was the score on the Cerebral Performance Categories (CPC) scale at 6 months. Safety outcomes included any serious adverse events. Secondary outcomes were mortality and neuron-specific enolase (NSE) levels on days 1 and 3.ResultsA total of 783 adult patients in a coma after cardiac arrest were assessed for eligibility, and 160 patients (median [IQR] age, 68 [57-75] years; 120 male [75%]) were enrolled. A total of 81 patients (51%) were assigned to the intervention group, and 79 (49%) were assigned to the control group. The common odds ratio (OR) for any CPC improvement in the intervention group was 1.78 (95% CI, 0.98-3.22; P = .06). This was consistent over all CPC categories. Mean (SD) NSE levels on day 1 after cardiac arrest were significantly lower in the intervention group (34 [6] μg/L vs 56 [13] μg/L; P = .04) and on day 3 (28 [6] μg/L vs 52 [14] μg/L; P = .08). Serious adverse events were comparable in incidence and type between the groups. Mortality was 37% (30 of 81) in the intervention group vs 51% (40 of 79) in the control group (absolute risk reduction, 14%; 95% CI, −2% to 29%; P = .08).Conclusions and RelevanceIn patients in a coma after cardiac arrest, intravenous treatment with acyl-ghrelin was safe and potentially effective to improve neurological outcome. Phase 3 trials are needed for conclusive evidence.Trial RegistrationClinicaltrialsregister.eu: EUCTR2018-000005-23-NL

Publisher

American Medical Association (AMA)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3