Psychotherapies for Generalized Anxiety Disorder in Adults

Author:

Papola Davide123,Miguel Clara45,Mazzaglia Mariacristina23,Franco Pamela67,Tedeschi Federico23,Romero Sara A.1,Patel Anushka R.8,Ostuzzi Giovanni23,Gastaldon Chiara23,Karyotaki Eirini45,Harrer Mathias9,Purgato Marianna23,Sijbrandij Marit45,Patel Vikram1,Furukawa Toshi A.10,Cuijpers Pim45,Barbui Corrado23

Affiliation:

1. Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts

2. WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Training in Mental Health and Service Evaluation, University of Verona, Verona, Italy

3. Section of Psychiatry, Department of Neuroscience, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, Italy

4. Section of Clinical Psychology, Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, the Netherlands

5. WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Dissemination of Psychological Interventions, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands

6. Department of Psychology, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile

7. Millennium Institute for Research in Depression and Personality (MIDAP), Santiago, Chile

8. Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts

9. Psychology & Digital Mental Health Care, Department of Health Sciences, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany

10. Department of Health Promotion and Human Behavior, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine/School of Public Health, Kyoto, Japan

Abstract

ImportanceGeneralized anxiety disorder (GAD) is one of the most common mental disorders in adults. Psychotherapies are among the most recommended treatments for GAD, but which should be considered as first-line treatment needs to be clarified.ObjectiveTo use a network meta-analysis to examine the short- and long-term associations of different psychotherapies with outcomes of effectiveness and acceptability in adults with GAD.Data SourcesMEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, and the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials were searched from database inception to January 1, 2023, to identify randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of psychotherapies for adults with GAD.Study SelectionRCTs comparing any type of psychotherapy against another or with a control condition for the treatment of adults (≥18 years, both sexes) with a primary diagnosis of GAD were eligible for inclusion.Data Extraction and SynthesisThis study followed Cochrane standards for extracting data and assessing data quality and used the PRISMA guideline for reporting. Risk of bias of individual studies was assessed using the second version of the Cochrane risk of bias tool, and the Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis was used to rate the certainty of evidence for meta-analytical results.Main Outcomes and MeasuresEight psychotherapies were compared against one another and with 2 control conditions. Primary outcomes were severity of GAD symptoms and acceptability of the psychotherapies. Random-effects model pairwise and network meta-analyses were conducted. For effectiveness, standardized mean differences (SMDs) were pooled, and for acceptability, relative risks with 95% CIs were calculated.ResultsData from 65 RCTs were included. Effect size estimates on data from 5048 participants (mean [SD], 70.9% [11.9%] women; mean [SD] age, 42.2 [12.5] years) suggested that third-wave cognitive behavior therapies (CBTs) (SMD, −0.76 [95% CI, −1.15 to −0.36]; certainty, moderate), CBT (SMD, −0.74 [95% CI, −1.09 to −0.38]; certainty, moderate), and relaxation therapy (SMD, −0.59 [95% CI, −1.07 to −0.11]; certainty, low) were associated with reduced GAD symptoms vs treatment as usual. Relative risks for all-cause discontinuation (indication of acceptability) signaled no differences compared with treatment as usual for all psychotherapies (eg, relative risk, 1.04 [95% CI, 0.64-1.67] for CBT vs treatment as usual). When excluding studies at high risk of bias, relaxation therapy lost its superiority over treatment as usual (SMD, −0.47; 95% CI, −1.18 to 0.23). When considering anxiety severity at 3 to 12 months after completion of the intervention, only CBT remained significantly associated with greater effectiveness than treatment as usual (SMD, −0.60; 95% CI, −0.99 to −0.21).Conclusions and RelevanceGiven the evidence in this systematic review and network meta-analysis for its associations with both acute and long-term effectiveness, CBT may represent the first-line therapy of GAD. Third-wave CBTs and relaxation therapy were associated with short-term effectiveness and may also be offered.

Publisher

American Medical Association (AMA)

Subject

Psychiatry and Mental health

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3