Oregon's Hospital Payment Cap and Enrollee Out-of-Pocket Spending and Service Use

Author:

Murray Roslyn C.1,Norton Edward C.2,Ryan Andrew M.1

Affiliation:

1. Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island

2. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor

Abstract

ImportanceEnrollee cost-sharing and health insurance premiums have grown alongside rising hospital prices. To control prices and price growth, the Oregon State Employee plan instituted a cap on hospital facility payments in October 2019 that was found to reduce hospital prices. Yet the program’s association with out-of-pocket spending and use among enrollees is unknown.ObjectiveTo assess the association of the Oregon State Employee Plan’s hospital payment cap with out-of-pocket spending and changes in service use among state employees enrolled in higher cost-sharing plans.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsUsing data from the Oregon All Payer All Claims database (January 2014 to December 2021), a difference-in-differences analysis was conducted to examine the association of Oregon’s hospital payment cap with enrollee out-of-pocket spending and service use. The main analysis focused on the outpatient setting, where there were significant declines in hospital prices. Changes in a subpopulation of employees enrolled in higher cost-sharing plans were also examined.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary outcome was outpatient out-of-pocket spending per procedure, which included the copayment, coinsurance, and/or deductible paid at the point of service. Changes in service use were also examined by counting the number of outpatient procedures received per enrollee per year.ResultsThe outpatient sample included 1 094 083 procedures from 92 523 Oregon educators and 4 510 342 procedures from 473 621 control enrollees. During the period before implementation, Oregon educators had higher out-of-pocket spending per outpatient procedure than the control group ($69.26 vs $41.87). The hospital payment cap was associated with a $6.60, or 9.5%, reduction in out-of-pocket spending per procedure (95% CI, −12.7 to −0.5) and a 0.24, or 4.8%, increase in the number of outpatient procedures received per enrollee per year (95% CI, 0.09-0.39) among those in higher cost-sharing plans. Enrollees receiving outpatient services from October 2019 through December 2021 saved an estimated $1.8 million. However, savings for the state were $10.3 million less than they would have been absent increases in service use.Conclusions and RelevanceThe study findings suggest that enrollees may benefit from reduced out-of-pocket spending due to hospital price regulations, but states should be mindful that price regulations may inadvertently increase health care service use.

Publisher

American Medical Association (AMA)

Reference20 articles.

1. It’s the prices, stupid: why the United States is so different from other countries.;Anderson;Health Aff (Millwood),2003

2. It’s still the prices, stupid: why the US spends so much on health care, and a tribute to Uwe Reinhardt.;Anderson;Health Aff (Millwood),2019

3. Out-of-pocket spending for hospitalizations among nonelderly adults.;Adrion;JAMA Intern Med,2016

4. Hospital facility prices declined as a result of Oregon’s hospital payment cap.;Murray;Health Aff (Millwood),2024

5. Health insurance and the demand for medical care: evidence from a randomized experiment.;Manning;Am Econ Rev,1987

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3