Association Between Syncope Trigger Type and Risk of Subsequent Life-Threatening Events in Patients With Long QT Syndrome

Author:

Younis Arwa12,Bos J. Martijn3,Zareba Wojciech2,Aktas Mehmet K.2,Wilde Arthur A. M.45,Tabaja Chadi1,Bodurian Christopher2,Tobert Kathryn E.3,McNitt Scott2,Polonsky Bronislava2,Shimizu Wataru6,Ackerman Michael J.3,Goldenberg Ilan2

Affiliation:

1. Cardiac Electrophysiology Section, Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio

2. Clinical Cardiovascular Research Center, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York

3. Divisions of Heart Rhythm Services and Pediatric Cardiology, Departments of Cardiovascular Medicine, Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, and Molecular Pharmacology & Experimental Therapeutics, Windland Smith Rice Genetic Heart Rhythm Clinic and Windland Smith Rice Sudden Death Genomics Laboratory, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota

4. Heart Center, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Department of Clinical and Experimental Cardiology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands

5. European Reference Network for Rare, Low Prevalence and Complex Diseases of the Heart, Amsterdam, the Netherlands

6. Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan

Abstract

ImportanceSyncope is the most powerful predictor for subsequent life-threatening events (LTEs) in patients with congenital long QT syndrome (LQTS). Whether distinct syncope triggers are associated with differential subsequent risk of LTEs is unknown.ObjectiveTo evaluate the association between adrenergic (AD)– and nonadrenergic (non–AD)-triggered syncopal events and the risk of subsequent LTEs in patients with LQT types 1 to 3 (LQT1-3).Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis retrospective cohort study included data from 5 international LQTS registries (Rochester, New York; the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; Israel, the Netherlands, and Japan). The study population comprised 2938 patients with genetically confirmed LQT1, LQT2, or LQT3 stemming from a single LQTS-causative variant. Patients were enrolled from July 1979 to July 2021.ExposuresSyncope by AD and non-AD triggers.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary end point was the first occurrence of an LTE. Multivariate Cox regression was used to determine the association of AD- or non–AD-triggered syncope on the risk of subsequent LTE by genotype. Separate analysis was performed in patients with β-blockers.ResultsA total of 2938 patients were included (mean [SD] age at enrollment, 29 [7] years; 1645 [56%] female). In 1331 patients with LQT1, a first syncope occurred in 365 (27%) and was induced mostly with AD triggers (243 [67%]). Syncope preceded 43 subsequent LTEs (68%). Syncopal episodes associated with AD triggers were associated with the highest risk of subsequent LTE (hazard ratio [HR], 7.61; 95% CI, 4.18-14.20; P < .001), whereas the risk associated with syncopal events due to non-AD triggers was statistically nonsignificant (HR, 1.50; 95% CI, 0.21-4.77; P = .97). In 1106 patients with LQT2, a first syncope occurred in 283 (26%) and was associated with AD and non-AD triggers in 106 (37%) and 177 (63%), respectively. Syncope preceded 55 LTEs (56%). Both AD- and non–AD-triggered syncope were associated with a greater than 3-fold increased risk of subsequent LTE (HR, 3.07; 95% CI, 1.66-5.67; P ≤ .001 and HR, 3.45, 95% CI, 1.96-6.06; P ≤ .001, respectively). In contrast, in 501 patients with LQT3, LTE was preceded by a syncopal episode in 7 (12%). In patients with LQT1 and LQT2, treatment with β-blockers following a syncopal event was associated with a significant reduction in the risk of subsequent LTEs. The rate of breakthrough events during treatment with β-blockers was significantly higher among those treated with selective agents vs nonselective agents.Conclusion and RelevanceIn this study, trigger-specific syncope in LQTS patients was associated with differential risk of subsequent LTE and response to β-blocker therapy.

Publisher

American Medical Association (AMA)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3