Author:
Abu-Arqub Sarah,Ahmida Ahmad,Da Cunha Godoy Lucas,Kuo Chia-Ling,Upadhyay Madhur,Yadav Sumit
Abstract
ABSTRACT
Objectives
To investigate aligner treatment protocols among orthodontists in the United States and Canada and assess the factors influencing clinician choices in aligner systems, treatment protocols, and targeted malocclusions for aligners.
Materials and Methods
A validated online questionnaire was developed specifically for this research and consisted of three sections. Section 1 evaluated demographics and experience with aligners. Section 2 assessed patient selection and demands and clinician confidence in treating various malocclusions with aligners. Section 3 evaluated treatment protocols used by clinicians. The American Association of Orthodontists Partners in Research Program distributed the survey via e-mail to active members in the United States and Canada.
Results
A total of 160 providers completed the survey. Aligners were used by 65.00% of respondents, with the Invisalign system the most popular (81.25%). Aligners were mostly used for adults (97.50%). Tipping was ranked as the easiest movement (1.79 ± 1.35). Extrusion (4.34 ± 1.53) and root movement (4.31 ± 1.27) were ranked as the most difficult. Most were confident treating mild (98.8%) and moderate (82.5%) crowded cases, spacing (96.9%), and anterior crossbite (85%). Of the providers, 58.12% recommended aligners to be changed weekly. Respondents who were confident addressing some of the severe malocclusions were more likely to use Invisalign.
Conclusions
Invisalign is the most popular aligner system, and clinicians seem to be confident using it. Providers are aware of the pitfalls of aligners; they find it challenging to perform root movement and extrusion, and they seem confident treating mild to moderate malocclusions. They avoid complex cases with impactions and severe skeletal problems.
Publisher
The Angle Orthodontist (EH Angle Education & Research Foundation)
Reference27 articles.
1. Boyd
RL,
Miller
R,
Vlaskalic
V.
The Invisalign system in adult orthodontics: mild crowding and space closure cases.
J Clin Orthod.
2000;
34:
203–
212.
2. Weir
T.
Clear aligners in orthodontic treatment.
Aust Dent J.
2017;
62:
58–
62.
3. Rossini
G,
Parrini
S,
Castroflorio
T,
Deregibus
A,
Debernardi
CL.
Efficacy of clear aligners in controlling orthodontic tooth movement: a systematic review.
Angle Orthod.
2015;
85:
881–
889.
4. Katzman
J,
Fenkell
A,
Katzman
D,
Yancey
C,
Chapman
J.
Arrangements for remote orthodontic treatment. Google Patents;
2018.
Inventors: Jordan Katzman, Alex Fenkell, David Katzman, Christopher Yancey, Josh Chapman, Jessica Cicurel Current Assignee: SDC US Smilepay SPV US Patent number: US20190252067A1 Full date: 4-29-2019
5. Buschang
PH,
Shaw
SG,
Ross
M,
Crosby
D,
Campbell
PM.
Comparative time efficiency of aligner therapy and conventional edgewise braces.
Angle Orthod.
2014;
84:
391–
396.
Cited by
15 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献